首页> 外文期刊>Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology >Comparative Analysis of Farmer Participatory Extension Approaches: Case of Farmer Field Schools and Master Farmer Training in Mashonaland Central Province of Zimbabwe
【24h】

Comparative Analysis of Farmer Participatory Extension Approaches: Case of Farmer Field Schools and Master Farmer Training in Mashonaland Central Province of Zimbabwe

机译:农民参与扩展方式的比较分析:以津巴布韦中部马绍纳兰农民田间学校和农民培训为主的案例

获取原文
       

摘要

This study made a comparative analysis of two extension approaches, Farmer Field Schools and Master Farmer Training with the objective of finding out the effectiveness of these approaches as regards farmer knowledge gains, skills empowerment, farmer adoption of recommended practices and cost effectiveness. Structured, semi structured questionnaires and informal interviews were used to collect data from farmers, local non-governmental organizations and extension workers. The results indicated that farmer field schools were more effective in terms of improvement in farmer’s knowledge, skills empowerment and change in crop husbandry practices. Master Farmer training improved farmers’ marketing strategies because of assistance rendered by extension workers. Use of farmer field schools is therefore recommended when implementing extension programs targeted at large groups of farmers inclined towards crop husbandry. Where emphasis is on change in marketing strategies use of master farmer training programs is recommended.
机译:这项研究对两种扩展方法进行了比较分析,即农民田间学校和农民专业培训,目的是找出这些方法在农民知识获取,技能赋权,农民采用推荐做法和成本效益方面的有效性。使用结构化,半结构化的问卷调查和非正式访谈从农民,当地非政府组织和推广人员那里收集数据。结果表明,农民田间学校在提高农民的知识,增强技能和改变农耕方式方面更有效。由于推广人员的协助,农民主培训提高了农民的营销策略。因此,在实施针对大量倾向于农牧业的农民群体的推广计划时,建议使用农民田间学校。在强调改变营销策略的地方,建议使用农民培训课程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号