...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of applied clinical medical physics / >Evaluation of lead equivalence of radiation protection apparatuses as a function of tube potential and spectral shaping filter
【24h】

Evaluation of lead equivalence of radiation protection apparatuses as a function of tube potential and spectral shaping filter

机译:评估辐射防护设备的铅当量与电子管电势和频谱整形滤波器的关系

获取原文

摘要

Purpose This study aims to evaluate the lead equivalence (LE) of radiation protective apparatuses under various combinations of tube potentials and spectral shaping filter. Method In this study, the commercially available 3M? Lead Foil Tape 421, with nominal lead thickness of 0.1?mm, was employed to determine the LE of four different radiation protective apparatuses. The LE of protective apparatus was determined by utilizing the X‐ray transmission curves obtained with the lead foil tape at 60–120 kVp in combination with the spectral shaping filters of 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9?mmCu. The experimental setup and test method, for the transmission measurements with narrow beam geometry, was performed in accordance to ASTM Designation F2547‐18 Standards. All measurements were obtained using cardiovascular interventional angiography system. Results A much larger discrepancies between the measured LE and stated (nominal) LE were observed at low tube potential (80?kVp) and thicker spectral shaping filters, the measured LE appears to be more consistent with the manufacturer specified nominal thickness for the protective apparatus investigated. On the other hand, for the lead protective eyeglasses, the measured lead equivalence of both the lead side shield and the lens of eyeglasses (0.38 and 0.85?mmPb respectively) are consistent across all tube voltage. Conclusion The conventional specification of LE without considering spectral shaping filter is a valid measure for tube voltages at and above 80?kVp. The measured LE generally exceed the specifications. The difference is most significant at lower tube potentials, and especially with thicker spectral shaping filters. At higher voltages (100?kVp), the measured LE and the nominal LE are in good agreement with each other irrespective of the spectral shaping filter thickness.
机译:目的本研究旨在评估在管电势和频谱整形滤波器的各种组合下的辐射防护设备的铅当量(LE)。方法在本研究中,市售的3M?使用标称铅厚度为0.1?mm的铅箔胶带421确定四种不同的辐射防护设备的LE。通过使用铅箔胶带在60–120 kVp处获得的X射线透射曲线与0.1、0.2、0.3、0.6和0.9?mmCu的光谱整形滤光片结合,可以确定保护装置的LE。针对窄波束几何形状的透射测量的实验设置和测试方法是根据ASTM F2547-18标准进行的。所有测量均使用心血管介入血管造影系统获得。结果在低管电势(80?kVp)和较厚的频谱整形滤光片上,观察到的LE与标称(标称)LE之间的差异要大得多,所测得的LE似乎更符合制造商指定的保护装置标称厚度调查。另一方面,对于铅防护眼镜,在所有管电压下,铅侧护罩和眼镜镜片的测得的铅当量(分别为0.38和0.85?mmPb)是一致的。结论不考虑频谱整形滤波器的LE的常规规格对于80?kVp及更高电压的管电压是一种有效的措施。测得的LE通常超过规格。这种差异在较低的管电势下最为明显,尤其是对于较厚的频谱整形滤波器而言。在更高的电压(> 100?kVp)下,无论频谱整形滤波器的厚度如何,测得的LE和标称LE彼此都非常一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号