首页> 外文期刊>Journal of applied clinical medical physics / >Treatment accuracy without rotational setup corrections in intracranial SRT
【24h】

Treatment accuracy without rotational setup corrections in intracranial SRT

机译:无需进行颅内SRT旋转矫正的治疗准确性

获取原文
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of actual rotational setup errors on dose distributions in intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) with different alternatives for treatment position selection. A total of 38 SRT fractions from 18 patients were retrospectively evaluated with rotational setup errors obtained from actual treatments. The planning computed tomography (CT) images were rotated according to online cone-beam CT (CBCT) images and the dose distribution was recalculated to the rotated CT images using three different patient positionings derived from: 1) an automatic 6D match neglecting rotation correction ( Auto 6 D ) ; 2) an automatic 3D match ( Auto 3 D ) ; and 3) a manual 3D match from actual treatment ( Treat 3 D ) . The mean conformity index (CI) was 0.92 for the original plans and 0.91 for the Auto 6 D plans. The mean CI decreased significantly ( p 0.01 ) to 0.78 and 0.80 for the Auto 3 D and the Treat 3 D plans, respectively. The mean minimum dose of the planning target volume (PTVmin) was 91.9% of the prescribed dose for the original plans and 92.1% for the Auto 6 D plans, while for the Auto 3 D and the Treat 3 D plans PTVmin decreased significantly ( p 0.01 ) to 78.9% and 80.2%, respectively. No significant differences were seen between the Auto 6 D and the original treatment plans in terms of the dose parameters. However, the Auto 3 D and the Treat 3 D plans were statistically significantly inferior ( p 0.01 ) to the Auto 6 D and the original plans. In addition, a significant negative correlation ( p 0.01 , | r | > 0.38 ) was found in the Auto 3 D and the Treat 3 D cases between the rotation error and CI, PTVmin or minimum dose of gross tumour volume. In SRT, a treatment plan of comparable quality to 6D rotation correction can be achieved by using 6D registration without a rotational correction in the selection of patient positioning. This was demonstrated for typical rotation errors seen in clinical practice.PACS number(s): 87.55, 87.57
机译:这项研究的目的是评估颅内立体定向放疗(SRT)中实际旋转设置误差对剂量分布的影响,并选择不同的治疗位置选择。回顾性评估了来自18位患者的38个SRT分数,并从实际治疗中获得了旋转设置误差。根据在线锥形束CT(CBCT)图像旋转计划的计算机断层扫描(CT)图像,并使用以下三种不同的患者位置,将剂量分布重新计算为旋转的CT图像:1)自动6D匹配忽略旋转校正(自动6 D); 2)自动3D比赛(Auto 3D);和3)实际治疗中的手动3D匹配(治疗3D)。原始计划的平均合格指数(CI)为0.92,而Auto 6 D计划的平均合格指数(CI)为0.91。 Auto 3 D和Treat 3 D计划的平均CI分别显着降低(p 0.01)至0.78和0.80。计划目标体积的平均最小剂量(PTVmin)为原始计划的规定剂量的91.9%,对于Auto 6 D计划为92.1%,而对于Auto 3 D和Treat 3 D计划,PTVmin显着降低(p 0.01到78.9%和80.2%。在剂量参数方面,Auto 6 D与原始治疗计划之间没有发现显着差异。但是,Auto 3 D和Treat 3 D计划在统计上显着低于Auto 6 D和原始计划(p 0.01)。此外,在Auto 3 D和Treat 3 D病例中,旋转误差与CI,PTVmin或总肿瘤体积的最小剂量之间存在显着的负相关性(p 0.01,| r |> 0.38)。在SRT中,可以通过使用6D配准实现质量与6D旋转校正相当的治疗计划,而无需在选择患者位置时进行旋转校正。这已证明是临床实践中常见的旋转误差.PACS编号:87.55,87.57

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号