首页> 外文期刊>Journal of applied clinical medical physics / >A cross‐sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of X‐ray equipment used in IVR
【24h】

A cross‐sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of X‐ray equipment used in IVR

机译:IVR中使用的X射线设备的辐射剂量和图像质量的横断面研究

获取原文
           

摘要

There are case reports of injuries caused by the radiation from interventional radiology (IVR) X-ray systems. Therefore, the management of radiation doses in IVR is important. However, no detailed report has evaluated image quality for a large number of IVR X-ray systems. As a result, it is unclear whether the image quality of the X-ray equipment currently used in IVR procedures is optimal. We compared the entrance surface doses and image quality of multiple IVR X-ray systems. This study was conducted in 2014 at 13 medical facilities using 18 IVR X-ray systems. We evaluated image quality and simultaneously measured the radiation dose. Entrance surface doses for fluoroscopy (duration, 1 min) and cineradiography (duration, 10 s) are measured using a 20-cm-thick acrylic plate and skin dose monitor. The image quality (such as spatial resolution and low-contrast detectability) of both fluoroscopy and cineradiography was evaluated using a QC phantom. For fluoroscopy, the average entrance surface dose using the 20-cm-thick acrylic plate was 13.9 (range 2.1–28.2) mGy/min. For cineradiography, the average entrance surface dose was 24.6 (range 5.1–49.3) mGy/10 s. We found positive correlations between radiation doses and image quality scores, in general, especially for fluoroscopy. The differences in surface dose among the 18 IVR X-ray systems were high (max/min, 9.7-fold for cineradiography; 13.4-fold for fluoroscopy). The differences in image quality scores (spatial resolution, low-contrast detectability, and dynamic range) were also very large. In general, there tended to be a correlation between radiation dose and image quality. Periodical measurements of the radiation dose and image quality of the X-ray equipment used for cineradiography and fluoroscopy in IVR are necessary. The need to minimize patient exposure requires that the dose be reduced to the minimum level that will generate an image with an acceptable degree of noise.PACS number(s): 87.57.C, 87.57.uq, 87.59.B, 87.59.bf, 87.59.C, 87.59.cf, 87.59.Dj
机译:有病例报告称由介入放射学(IVR)X射线系统的辐射造成伤害。因此,IVR中辐射剂量的管理很重要。但是,没有详尽的报告评估大量IVR X射线系统的图像质量。结果,目前尚不清楚IVR程序中当前使用的X射线设备的图像质量是否最佳。我们比较了多个IVR X射线系统的入射表面剂量和图像质量。这项研究于2014年在13个医疗机构使用18个IVR X射线系统进行。我们评估了图像质量,同时测量了辐射剂量。使用20厘米厚的丙烯酸板和皮肤剂量监测仪测量荧光检查(持续时间1分钟)和放射线照相术(持续时间10 s)的入射表面剂量。使用QC体模评估了荧光检查和X线摄影的图像质量(例如空间分辨率和低对比度可检测性)。对于荧光检查,使用20厘米厚的丙烯酸板的平均入射表面剂量为13.9 mGy / min(范围为2.1–28.2)。对于电影摄影,平均入射表面剂量为24.6 mGy / 10 s(范围5.1–49.3)。通常,我们发现辐射剂量与图像质量得分之间存在正相关,特别是对于荧光检查而言。 18个IVR X射线系统之间的表面剂量差异很大(最大/最小,放射线照相术为9.7倍;荧光透视术为13.4倍)。图像质量得分(空间分辨率,低对比度可检测性和动态范围)的差异也很大。通常,辐射剂量和图像质量之间往往存在相关性。必须定期测量IVR中用于电影摄影和荧光检查的X射线设备的辐射剂量和图像质量。为了尽量减少患者暴露,需要将剂量降低到能够产生具有可接受噪声水平的图像的最小水平。PACS编号:87.57.C,87.57.uq,87.59.B,87.59.bf, 87.59.C,87.59.cf,87.59.Dj

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号