首页> 外文期刊>Journal of applied clinical medical physics / >Comparing the monoisocentric and dual isocentric techniques in chest wall radiotherapy of mastectomy patients
【24h】

Comparing the monoisocentric and dual isocentric techniques in chest wall radiotherapy of mastectomy patients

机译:乳腺切除术患者胸壁放疗中单等中心和双重等中心技术的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

The monoisocentric (MIT) and dual isocentric (DIT) techniques are compared for the mastectomy patients undergoing chest wall radiotherapy, and a new practical method is suggested for determining the dose calculation reference point to be used in the MIT. Data of 18 mastectomy patients having chest wall radiotherapy were used. To find the appropriate dose calculation reference point for the MIT, the target tissue was divided into nine regions with 17 points as the appropriate candidates. After finding the best reference point for the MIT, dose calculations were made for each patient based on the MIT and DIT to determine the dose distributions of the target volume and organs at risk. The lateral component of the dose calculation reference point was found to be located at one-third of the distance between the geometrical center and the lateral border of the chest wall in the lateral direction toward the outer border. The longitudinal component of this point was found to be located at the geometrical center of the chest wall with a depth located around 2–3 cm under the patients’ skin. There was no significant difference between the two radiotherapy planning techniques (MIT and DIT) regarding the dose distributions in the organs at risk and the 95% of the prescribed dose coverage of the target tissue. However, a significant difference for the 105% of the prescribed dose coverage, maximum dose delivered to the target tissue, and the level 2 lymph nodes dose was found, with the DIT showing higher values. Because of the good matching and no superposition observed between the treatment fields in the MIT, it was expected and confirmed that the hot and cold regions (with higher and lower doses than the prescribed dose) with the MIT are significantly fewer than that of the DIT. Therefore, to perform a better conformal radiotherapy for the patients having mastectomy, it could be recommended to use the MIT instead of the DIT and other conventional techniques.PACS numbers: 87.53.Bn, 87.53.Kn, 87.55.D-, 87.55.ne
机译:比较了接受胸壁放疗的乳房切除术患者的单等中心点(MIT)和双等中心点(DIT)技术,并提出了一种新的实用方法来确定将在MIT中使用的剂量计算参考点。使用18例行胸壁放射治疗的乳房切除术患者的数据。为了找到适合MIT的适当剂量计算参考点,将目标组织划分为9个区域,其中17个点为适当的候选对象。在找到MIT的最佳参考点后,根据MIT和DIT为每位患者进行剂量计算,以确定目标体积和处于危险状态的器官的剂量分布。发现剂量计算参考点的横向分量位于在几何中心与胸壁的横向边界之间在朝向外边界的横向方向上的距离的三分之一处。发现该点的纵向分量位于胸壁的几何中心,深度在患者皮肤下约2–3 cm。两种放疗计划技术(MIT和DIT)在有风险的器官中的剂量分布和目标组织的规定剂量覆盖率的95%之间没有显着差异。但是,发现在规定剂量覆盖率的105%,输送至目标组织的最大剂量和2级淋巴结剂量方面存在显着差异,而DIT显示出更高的值。由于在MIT的各个治疗区域之间具有良好的匹配性且没有观察到重叠,因此可以预期并确认MIT的高温和低温区域(剂量高于和低于规定剂量)明显少于DIT 。因此,为了对乳房切除术的患者进行更好的保形放疗,建议使用MIT代替DIT和其他常规技术.PACS编号:87.53.Bn,87.53.Kn,87.55.D-,87.55.ne

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号