...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology >Changes in stroke volume during an alveolar recruitment maneuvers through a stepwise increase in positive end expiratory pressure and transient continuous positive airway pressure in anesthetized patients. A prospective observational pilot study
【24h】

Changes in stroke volume during an alveolar recruitment maneuvers through a stepwise increase in positive end expiratory pressure and transient continuous positive airway pressure in anesthetized patients. A prospective observational pilot study

机译:通过逐步增加麻醉患者的呼气末正压和短暂持续气道正压,在肺泡募集演习中的搏动量变化。前瞻性观察性试验研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background and Aims: Recruitment maneuvers may be used during anesthesia as part of perioperative protective ventilation strategy. However, the hemodynamic effect of recruitment maneuvers remain poorly documented in this setting. Material and Methods: This was a prospective observational study performed in operating theatre including patients scheduled for major vascular surgery. Patients were monitored with invasive arterial pressure and esophageal doppler. After induction of general anesthesia, before surgery began, preload optimization based on stroke volume (SV) variation following fluid challenge was performed. Then, an alveolar recruitment maneuver (ARM) through stepwise increase in positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was performed. Hemodynamic data were noted before, during, and after the alveolar recruitment maneuver. Results: ARM through stepwise increase in PEEP and CPAP were applied in 22 and 14 preload independent patients, respectively. Relative changes in SV during ARMs were significantly greater in the ARMsubCPAP/subgroup (-39 ± 20%) as compared to the ARMsubPEEP/subgroup (-15 ± 22%; P= 0.002). The difference (95% CI) in relative decrease in SV between ARMsubCPAP/suband ARMsubPEEP/subgroups was -24% (-38 to -9; P= 0.001). Changes in arterial pressure, cardiac index, pulse pressure variation, peak velocity, and corrected flow time measures were not different between groups. Conclusion: During anesthesia, in preload independent patients, ARMs through CPAP resulted in a significantly greater decrease in SV than stepwise increase in PEEP. During anesthesia, ARM should be used cautiously.
机译:背景与目的:麻醉期间可采用招募策略作为围手术期保护性通气策略的一部分。但是,在这种情况下,募集演习的血液动力学效应仍然很少被证明。材料和方法:这是一项在手术室中进行的前瞻性观察性研究,包括计划进行大血管手术的患者。用侵入性动脉压和食道多普勒监测患者。全身麻醉诱导后,在手术开始之前,根据体液激发后的中风量(SV)变化进行了预负荷优化。然后,通过逐步增加呼气末正压(PEEP)或持续气道正压(CPAP)进行肺泡补充动作(ARM)。在肺泡募集演习之前,之中和之后记录血流动力学数据。结果:分别通过22例和14例预负荷独立患者应用ARM通过PEEP和CPAP逐步增加。与ARM PEEP 组相比,ARM CPAP 组中ARM期间SV的相对变化显着更大(-39±20%)(-15±22%; P = 0.002)。 ARM CPAP 和ARM PEEP 组之间SV相对降低的差异(95%CI)为-24%(-38至-9; P = 0.001)。两组之间的动脉压,心脏指数,脉压变化,峰值速度和校正的血流时间测量值变化无差异。结论:在麻醉期间,在独立负荷患者中,通过CPAP进行ARM治疗可导致SV下降明显大于PEEP逐步上升。麻醉期间,应谨慎使用ARM。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号