...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology >A comparative study of early and late extubation following transoral odontoidectomy and posterior fixation
【24h】

A comparative study of early and late extubation following transoral odontoidectomy and posterior fixation

机译:经口腔齿状突切除术后后路早期拔管的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and Aims: Elective ventilation is the usual practice after transoral odontoidectomy (TOO) and posterior fixation. This practice of elective ventilation is not based on any evidence. The primary objective of our study was to find out the difference in oxygenation and ventilation in patients extubated early compared to those extubated late after TOO and posterior fixation. The secondary objectives were to compare the length of Intensive Care Unit (ICU)/hospital stay and pulmonary complications between the two groups. Material and Methods: After TOO and posterior fixation, patients were either extubated in the operating room (Group E) or extubated next day (Group D). The oxygenation (PaO 2 :FiO 2 ratio) and ventilation (PaCO 2 ) of the two groups before surgery, at 30 min and at 6/12/24 and 48 h after extubation were compared. Complications, durations of ICU and hospital stay were noted. Results: The base-line PaO 2 :FiO 2 and PaCO 2 was comparable between the groups. No significant change in the PaO 2 : FiO 2 was noted in the postoperative period in either group as compared to the preoperative values. Except for at 12 h after surgery, there was no significant difference between the two groups at various time intervals. No significant change in the PaCO 2 level was seen during the study period in either group. PaCO 2 measured at 30 min after surgery was more in Group E (37.5 ± 3.2 mmHg in Group E vs. 34.6 ± 2.9 mmHg in Group D), otherwise there was no significant difference between the two groups at various time intervals. One patient in Group E (7.1%) and two patients in Group D (13%) developed postoperative respiratory complication, but the difference was not statistically significant. The mean ICU stay (Group D = 42 ± 25 h vs. Group E = 25.1 ± 16.9 h) and mean hospital stay (Group D = 9.9 ± 4 days vs. Group E = 7.6 ± 2.2 days) were longer in Group D patients. Conclusion: Ventilation and oxygenation in the postoperative period in patients undergoing TOO and posterior fixation are not different between the two groups. However, the duration of ICU and hospital stay was prolonged in group D.
机译:背景与目的:经口齿状突切除术(TOO)和后路固定术后通常采用择期通气。这种选择性通气的做法没有任何证据。我们研究的主要目的是找出早期拔管的患者与TOO和后路固定后拔管的患者相比,其氧合和通气的差异。次要目标是比较两组之间的加护病房(ICU)/医院住院时间和肺部并发症。材料和方法:TOO和后固定后,将患者在手术室拔管(E组)或在第二天拔管(D组)。两组在术前,30分钟和6点的氧合(PaO 2 :FiO 2 比)和通气量(PaCO 2 )比较拔管后/ 12/24和48 h。记录并发症,ICU持续时间和住院时间。结果:两组之间的基线PaO 2 :FiO 2 和PaCO 2 是可比较的。与术前相比,两组术后PaO 2 :FiO 2 均无明显变化。除了术后12 h,两组在不同时间间隔无显着差异。在研究期间,两组的PaCO 2 水平均无明显变化。 E组在术后30分钟测得的PaCO 2 更高(E组为37.5±3.2 mmHg,而D组为34.6±2.9 mmHg),否则两组在手术后无明显差异。各种时间间隔。 E组1例(7.1%)和D组2例(13%)发生了术后呼吸系统并发症,但差异无统计学意义。 D组患者的平均ICU停留时间(D组为42±25小时,E组为25.1±16.9小时)和平均住院时间(D组为9.9±4天,E组为7.6±2.2天)更长。结论:两组术后TOO加后路固定术后患者的通气和充氧无差异。然而,D组的ICU和住院时间延长了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号