首页> 外文期刊>Japan Review >Kōetsumura: Of Rhythms and Reminiscence in Hon'ami Kōetsu's Commune
【24h】

Kōetsumura: Of Rhythms and Reminiscence in Hon'ami Kōetsu's Commune

机译:Kōetsumura:在Hon'amiKōetsu的公社的节奏和怀念

获取原文
           

摘要

Historical cycles, widely used as organizational expedients in Chinese political history ("dynastic cycles"), have also been applied to rhythms of political change in Japan. Th e life of eclectic artist Hon'ami Kōetsu spans the cyclic rise and fall of several periods and political regimes: the warring states or sengoku (mid 15 th c.–late 16 th c.), the Azuchi-Momoyama (1568–1600), and the "Great Peace" of the Tokugawa period (1600–1868). Th ough an iconic presence within Kyoto's resurgent machishū establishment, Kōetsu nonetheless defi es easy placement within this paradigm of cyclical change. 2 Th is article considers what cyclical history might contribute to the study of Kōetsu and interprets the disempowerment of Kyoto's machishū following the establishment of the Tokugawa regime through a discussion of Kōetsumura, an autonomous commune established by Kōetsu in Takagamine in 1615. 3 Scholarship has labeled Kōetsu a Heian revivalist for his role in the development of the Rinpa school. Th e label points to his relationships with elite warriors and courtiers, and to the decorative, nativistic features of his art as evidence of nostalgia for classical courtliness. Th is essay posits that cyclical history aff ords an alternative interpretation of Kōetsu: as an anachronism—not a revivalist—responding in self-defensive ways to recent events that threatened machishū culture and the Hon'ami house in particular.
机译:历史周期被广泛用作中国政治历史中的组织权柄(“王朝周期”),也已应用于日本的政治变革节奏。折衷主义艺术家本南光悦的一生经历了数个时期和政治体制的周期性兴衰:战国或战国(15世纪中叶至16世纪中叶),安土桃山(1568年至1600年) ),以及德川时代(1600-1868年)的“大和平”。尽管在京都复兴的町修町建立了标志性的形象,但光越仍然很容易将其置于这种周期性变化的范式中。第二篇文章考虑了什么周期性历史可能对光悦的研究做出贡献,并通过对光悦村的讨论,解释了德川政权成立后京都大雄町的无权。光悦村是高悦在1615年在高垣建立的自治公社。3奖学金被标记为平安时代的复兴者光越(Kōetsu)在林帕学校的发展中所扮演的角色。标签指向他与精英战士和朝臣的关系,并指出他的艺术具有装饰性,本土性,这是对古典礼貌的怀旧证明。本文认为,周期性历史为光悦提供了另一种解释:作为一种过时主义而不是复兴主义者,以自卫的方式应对威胁到町修文化尤其是本南见屋的近期事件。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Japan Review》 |2010年第7期|共27页
  • 作者

    W. Puck BRECHER;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类 K313.03;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号