...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies >The Effects of Electroacupuncture of the Myofascial Trigger Points on the Pain and the Sensory Thresholds in Chronic Low Back Pain
【24h】

The Effects of Electroacupuncture of the Myofascial Trigger Points on the Pain and the Sensory Thresholds in Chronic Low Back Pain

机译:肌筋膜触发点的电针对慢性下腰痛的疼痛和感觉阈值的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Relevance: Lumbar myofascial trigger points (MTP) are a major cause of chronic low back pain (LBP) that electroacupuncture (EA) may deactivate more efficiently to contribute to a better analgesia. Objective: This study compares analgesia and peripheral sensory thresholds when LBP patients receive manual acupuncture (MA) with or without EA of lumbar MTP. Methods: Patients with chronic LBP and presenting active MTP received randomly 4 weekly 45-min sessions of MA only (n Z 15) or with EA of their MTP (n Z 15) (AS-4, Schwa Medico, 150 ms, 100 Hz, sub-noxious intensity). We assessed Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) before and 4 weeks after treatment, with VAS before each session. QST measured electrical thresholds for non-nociceptive A-beta fibers, nociceptive A-delta and C fibers in 2 dermatomes: from the most affected side of the LBP (L4) and the contralateral pain-free arm (C7). VAS reduction of 3 or below 3 on a 10 points scale was considered clinically relevant. Paired t-test compared thresholds (mean [SD]) and Wilcoxon test compared VAS (median [IQR]), significant p < 0.05. Results: Reduction of VAS reached clinical and statistical relevance after the 1st session in the EA (from 7[3] to 3[1]) but not in the MA (6.8 [3] to 4.9 [3.6]). From session 2 to 4, VAS reached clinical and statistical relevance in both groups. However, 4 weeks post-treatment, VAS for EA was significantly lower than for MA (2.1[1] vs. 4[1]) Pre-treatment, thresholds for A-delta and C fibers in L4 were significantly lower than those in C7 for both groups (respectively 60[30] and 63[10] % of C7 for EA and 65[11] and 60[36] % for MA) but corrected only for EA (91[11] and 106 [36] %).
机译:相关性:腰肌筋膜触发点(MTP)是慢性下腰痛(LBP)的主要原因,电针(EA)可能会更有效地失活以促进更好的镇痛作用。目的:本研究比较了LBP患者接受或不采用EA腰部MTP的手法针刺(MA)时的镇痛和周围感觉阈值。方法:患有慢性LBP且表现活跃的MTP的患者,每4周45分钟随机接受仅MA(n Z 15)或EA的MTP(n Z 15)(AS-4,Schwa Medico,150 ms,100 Hz) ,亚毒性强度)。我们评估了治疗前和治疗后4周的定量感官测试(QST),并在每次治疗前进行了VAS评估。 QST测量了两种皮肤切开术中非伤害性A-β纤维,伤害性A-δ和C纤维的电阈值:从最受累的LBP一侧(L4)和对侧无痛手臂(C7)。在10分制上,VAS减少3或3以下被认为具有临床意义。配对t检验比较阈值(平均值[SD]),Wilcoxon检验比较VAS(中位数[IQR]),显着p <0.05。结果:在EA(从7 [3]降至3 [1])的第一届会议后,VAS的降低达到了临床和统计意义,而在MA则没有(6.8 [3]至4.9 [3.6])。从第2届到第4届,VAS在两组中均达到临床和统计学意义。然而,治疗后4周,EA的VAS显着低于MA(2.1 [1]比4 [1])。治疗前,L4中A三角洲和C纤维的阈值明显低于C7两组(EA分别为C7的60 [30]和63 [10]%,MA分别为65 [11]和60 [36]%),但仅针对EA进行了校正(91 [11]和106 [36]%) 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号