首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Accounting & Marketing >Medical Devices Service Life Cycle Cost Management in Al Karak Hospital as a Case Study
【24h】

Medical Devices Service Life Cycle Cost Management in Al Karak Hospital as a Case Study

机译:以Al Karak医院为例的医疗设备服务生命周期成本管理为例

获取原文
       

摘要

This study implemented the concept of LCC to select between two alternative models from three different sets of medical devices, including two electrolyte models, two X-ray models and two infant incubator models as case studies. For LCC calculations, Kaufmann approach was used, which defines the operating profile, utilizing factor, the most critical cost parameters (i.e. failure rate and repair rate) and any related cost component (i.e. operating cost and maintenance cost). Our results showed that LCC could improve the range and quality of information available for decision-making when a comparison is performed between two alternatives. When comparing the annual LCC values for each two alternative models, the key effective cost categories affecting LCC were the consumable power cost and/ or consumables costs and the maintenance cost. Results showed that LCC and device age are linearly related indicating the increase of the cost to maintain the device in service by increasing the device age. Paired test showed significant differences between each two alternative models in annual LCC estimates. In this study, for the electrolyte devices (Model 2) displayed 25% lower annual LCC as compared with (Model 1). Higher annual LCC value (4.4%) was found for the X-ray device (Model 1) than ( Model 2) suggesting that (Model 2) is better alternative than (Model 1), even though foe the infant incubator devices (Model 2) has higher capital cost. The annual LCC estimate for (Model 1) was 5% lower than (Model 2) due to lower initial cost and maintenance cost. In conclusion, LCC analysis used in this study is vital for decision making for justifying certain model selection among a group of alternatives based on total costs rather than on the initial purchase price of a device.
机译:这项研究实施了LCC的概念,以便从三套不同的医疗设备中选择两种替代模型,其中包括两种电解质模型,两种X射线模型和两种婴儿保温箱模型作为案例研究。对于LCC计算,使用Kaufmann方法,该方法定义了运营概况,利用因素,最关键的成本参数(即故障率和维修率)以及任何相关成本成分(即运营成本和维护成本)。我们的结果表明,当在两种选择之间进行比较时,LCC可以改善可用于决策的信息的范围和质量。在比较每两个替代模型的年度LCC值时,影响LCC的主要有效成本类别为可消耗的电力成本和/或可消耗的成本以及维护成本。结果表明,LCC与设备寿命成线性关系,表明通过延长设备寿命来增加维护设备的成本。配对测试显示,在年度LCC估算中,每两个替代模型之间存在显着差异。在这项研究中,与模型1相比,电解质装置(模型2)的年度LCC降低了25%。发现X射线设备(模型1)的年LCC值(4.4%)比(模型2)高,这表明,即使对婴儿保温箱设备(模型2)而言,(模型2)比(模型1)更好。 )具有较高的资本成本。由于较低的初始成本和维护成本,(模型1)的年度LCC估算值比(模型2)低5%。总之,在这项研究中使用的LCC分析对于基于总成本而不是基于设备的初始购买价格在一组替代品中证明某些模型选择的决策至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号