...
首页> 外文期刊>JMIR Medical Informatics >Patient Adherence to Scheduled Vital Sign Measurements During Home Telemonitoring: Analysis of the Intervention Arm in a Before and After Trial
【24h】

Patient Adherence to Scheduled Vital Sign Measurements During Home Telemonitoring: Analysis of the Intervention Arm in a Before and After Trial

机译:病人在家庭远程监护期间遵守预定的生命体征测量:试验前后的干预臂分析

获取原文

摘要

Background In a home telemonitoring trial, patient adherence with scheduled vital signs measurements is an important aspect that has not been thoroughly studied and for which data in the literature are limited. Levels of adherence have been reported as varying from approximately 40% to 90%, and in most cases, the adherence rate usually dropped off steadily over time. This drop is more evident in the first few weeks or months after the start. Higher adherence rates have been reported for simple types of monitoring and for shorter periods of intervention. If patients do not follow the intended procedure, poorer results than expected may be achieved. Hence, analyzing factors that can influence patient adherence is of great importance. Objective The goal of the research was to present findings on patient adherence with scheduled vital signs measurements in the recently completed Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) national trial of home telemonitoring of patients (mean age 70.5 years, SD 9.3 years) with chronic conditions (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary artery disease, hypertensive diseases, congestive heart failure, diabetes, or asthma) carried out at 5 locations along the east coast of Australia. We investigated the ability of chronically ill patients to carry out a daily schedule of vital signs measurements as part of a chronic disease management care plan over periods exceeding 6 months (302 days, SD 135 days) and explored different levels of adherence for different measurements as a function of age, gender, and supervisory models. Methods In this study, 113 patients forming the test arm of a Before and After Control Intervention (BACI) home telemonitoring trial were analyzed. Patients were required to monitor on a daily basis a range of vital signs determined by their chronic condition and comorbidities. Vital signs included noninvasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, spirometry, electrocardiogram (ECG), blood glucose level, body temperature, and body weight. Adherence was calculated as the number of days during which at least 1 measurement was taken over all days where measurements were scheduled. Different levels of adherence for different measurements, as a function of age, gender, and supervisory models, were analyzed using linear regression and analysis of covariance for a period of 1 year after the intervention. Results Patients were monitored on average for 302 (SD 135) days, although some continued beyond 12 months. The overall adherence rate for all measurements was 64.1% (range 59.4% to 68.8%). The adherence rates of patients monitored in hospital settings relative to those monitored in community settings were significantly higher for spirometry (69.3%, range 60.4% to 78.2%, versus 41.0%, range 33.1% to 49.0%, P <.001), body weight (64.5%, range 55.7% to 73.2%, versus 40.5%, range 32.3% to 48.7%, P <.001), and body temperature (66.8%, range 59.7% to 73.9%, versus 55.2%, range 48.4% to 61.9%, P =.03). Adherence with blood glucose measurements (58.1%, range 46.7% to 69.5%, versus 50.2%, range 42.8% to 57.6%, P =.24) was not significantly different overall. Adherence rates for blood pressure (68.5%, range 62.7% to 74.2%, versus 59.7%, range 52.1% to 67.3%, P =.04), ECG (65.6%, range 59.7% to 71.5%, versus 56.5%, range 48.7% to 64.4%, P =.047), and pulse oximetry (67.0%, range 61.4% to 72.7%, versus 56.4%, range 48.6% to 64.1%, P =.02) were significantly higher in males relative to female subjects. No statistical differences were observed between rates of adherence for the younger patient group (70 years and younger) and older patient group (older than 70 years). Conclusions Patients with chronic conditions enrolled in the home telemonitoring trial were able to record their vital signs at home at least once every 2 days over prolonged periods of time. Male patients maintained a higher adherence than female patients over time, and patients supervised by hospital-based care coordinators reported higher levels of adherence with their measurement schedule relative to patients supervised in community settings. This was most noticeable for spirometry. Trial Registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613000635763; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=364030&isReview=true (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6xPOU3DpR).
机译:背景技术在家庭远程监控试验中,按计划进行生命体征测量的患者依从性是一个重要方面,尚未得到充分研究,并且文献中的数据有限。据报道,依从性水平从大约40%到90%不等,并且在大多数情况下,依从性通常会随着时间的推移而稳定下降。在开始后的前几周或几个月内,这种下降更为明显。据报道,对于简单的监测类型和较短的干预时间,依从性较高。如果患者不遵循预期的程序,则可能会获得比预期差的结果。因此,分析可能影响患者依从性的因素非常重要。目的本研究的目的是在最近完成的联邦科学与工业研究组织(CSIRO)全国性慢性病患者家庭远程监护国家试验(平均年龄70.5岁,标准差9.3岁)中介绍按计划的生命体征测量结果对患者依从性的发现。在澳大利亚东海岸的5个地点进行了各种疾病(慢性阻塞性肺疾病,冠状动脉疾病,高血压疾病,充血性心力衰竭,糖尿病或哮喘)。我们调查了慢性病患者在超过6个月(302天,标准差135天)内执行慢性疾病管理护理计划的一部分,每天进行生命体征测量的每日计划的能力,并探讨了针对不同测量的不同依从性水平年龄,性别和监管模式的函数。方法在本研究中,对113例患者进行了控制干预前后(BACI)家庭远程监控试验的测试臂的分析。要求患者每天监测一系列由其慢性病和合并症决定的生命体征。生命体征包括无创血压,脉搏血氧饱和度,肺活量测定,心电图(ECG),血糖水平,体温和体重。依从性是指在计划进行测量的所有天中至少进行1次测量的天数。干预后1年内,使用线性回归和协方差分析对不同测量值的依从性水平(随年龄,性别和监督模型的变化)进行了分析。结果平均监测了302天(标准差135天),尽管有些病人持续了12个月以上。所有测量的总体依从率为64.1%(范围从59.4%到68.8%)。相对于社区环境中监测的患者,肺活量测定法在医院环境中监测的患者的依从率显着更高(69.3%,范围从60.4%至78.2%,而41.0%,范围从33.1%至49.0%,P <.001),身体体重(64.5%,范围55.7%至73.2%,而40.5%,范围32.3%至48.7%,P <.001)和体温(66.8%,范围59.7%至73.9%,而55.2%,范围48.4%至61.9%,P = .03)。总体而言,血糖测量的依从性(58.1%,范围从46.7%至69.5%,而50.2%,范围从42.8%至57.6%,P = 0.24)没有显着差异。血压的依从率(68.5%,范围从62.7%至74.2%,而59.7%,范围从52.1%至67.3%,P = 0.04),ECG(65.6%,范围从59.7%至71.5%,对56.5%男性相对于女性显着高出48.7%至64.4%,P = .047)和脉搏血氧饱和度(67.0%,范围61.4%至72.7%,而56.4%,范围48.6%至64.1%,P = .02)科目。在年轻患者组(70岁及以下)和老年患者组(70岁以上)之间的依从率之间未观察到统计学差异。结论参加家庭远程监护试验的患有慢性病的患者能够在很长一段时间内至少每隔2天在家中记录一次他们的生命体征。随着时间的流逝,男性患者的依从性要高于女性患者,并且由医院护理协调员监督的患者报告的依从性水平要高于社区环境中接受监督的患者。这对于肺活量测定法最为明显。试验注册澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心ACTRN12613000635763; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=364030&isReview=true(由WebCite存档,网址为http://www.webcitation.org/6xPOU3DpR)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号