首页> 外文期刊>JA Clinical Reports >General anesthesia in a patient with asymptomatic second-degree two-to-one atrioventricular block
【24h】

General anesthesia in a patient with asymptomatic second-degree two-to-one atrioventricular block

机译:无症状二度二合一房室传导阻滞患者的全身麻醉

获取原文
       

摘要

BackgroundThe major perioperative concern in patients with second-degree atrioventricular (AV) block is the progression to complete AV block. Therefore, the prophylactic implantation of a temporary pacemaker prior to surgery is recommended, especially in symptomatic patients. However, as no quantitative preoperative risk assessment from progression to complete AV block is available, there is currently no established indication for preoperative prophylactic pacemaker implantation. Here, we present a case of progression from asymptomatic second-degree two-to-one (2:1) AV block to complete AV block following the induction of general anesthesia. Case presentationA 69-year-old female with degenerative spinal stenosis was scheduled for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery under general anesthesia. She had no cardiac symptoms, but routine preoperative resting 12-lead electrocardiogram revealed second-degree 2:1 AV block. After discussion with the surgeon and referring cardiologist, we scheduled the surgery without implantation of a temporary pacemaker before surgery for the following reasons: (1) asymptomatic, (2) no evidence of underlying cardiac disease, and (3) a narrow QRS complex. On the day of surgery, general anesthesia was induced with 150?mg of intravenous thiamylal and 25?μg of fentanyl, followed by intravenous administration of 50?mg of rocuronium to facilitate endotracheal intubation. Sevoflurane (1.0–2.0%) was used to maintain anesthesia. A few minutes after induction, the 2:1 AV block progressively converted to complete AV block, and the surgery was postponed. During emergence from anesthesia, the third-degree AV block recovered to 2:1 AV block, similar with the preoperative pattern. The patient was monitored in the intensive care unit for 2?days and then transferred to the normal orthopedic ward uneventfully. One month later, the surgery was rescheduled with preoperative implantation of a temporary pacemaker. A slow mask induction using sevoflurane with oxygen was started. Upon loss of consciousness during the inhalation of initial sevoflurane, complete AV block developed and temporary pacing was immediately initiated. Subsequent anesthesia and surgery were uneventful. The patient made an uncomplicated recovery from surgery with stable hemodynamics. The temporary pacemaker was not required after surgery, and the pacemaker catheter was removed 1?day after surgery. ConclusionsThe present case indicates that a prophylactic pacemaker should be implanted preoperatively in patients who have 2:1 AV block even without symptoms.
机译:背景患有二级房室传导阻滞(AV)的患者在围手术期中最主要的担心是进展为完全性AV阻滞。因此,建议在手术前预防性植入起搏器,特别是对有症状的患者。但是,由于尚无从进展到完全性房室传导阻滞的定量术前风险评估,因此目前尚无术前预防性起搏器植入的明确指征。在这里,我们介绍了一种从无症状的二度二比一(2:1)AV阻滞发展为完全麻醉后的完全性AV阻滞的病例。病例介绍计划将一名69岁女性退行性椎管狭窄症在全身麻醉下进行经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合手术。她没有心脏症状,但常规的术前静息12导联心电图显示2度2:1房室传导阻滞。经过与外科医生和心脏病专家的讨论后,我们计划在手术前不植入临时起搏器的原因如下:(1)无症状,(2)没有潜在心脏病的证据,(3)狭窄的QRS复合物。在手术当天,使用150?mg的静脉注射噻甲醛和25?μg的芬太尼进行全身麻醉,然后静脉注射50?mg的罗库溴铵以促进气管插管。七氟醚(1.0–2.0%)用于维持麻醉。诱导后几分钟,2:1 AV阻滞逐渐转变为完全性AV阻滞,手术被推迟。在麻醉过程中,三度房室传导阻滞恢复到2:1房室传导阻滞,类似于术前模式。在重症监护室对患者进行了2天的监控,然后将其平稳地转移到普通骨科病房。一个月后,该手术重新安排了术前植入临时起搏器的时间。开始使用七氟醚与氧气进行缓慢的面膜诱导。在吸入最初的七氟醚过程中失去知觉时,会发展出完全的房室传导阻滞,并立即开始临时起搏。随后的麻醉和手术均顺利进行。该患者从手术中获得了简单的恢复,血液动力学稳定。手术后不需要临时起搏器,并且在术后1天取下起搏器导管。结论本病例表明,即使没有症状也有2:1 AV阻滞的患者应在术前植入预防性起搏器。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号