...
首页> 外文期刊>Drugs - Real World Outcomes >Economic Impact in Medicaid Beneficiaries with Schizophrenia and Cardiometabolic Comorbidities Treated with Once-Monthly Paliperidone Palmitate vs. Oral Atypical Antipsychotics
【24h】

Economic Impact in Medicaid Beneficiaries with Schizophrenia and Cardiometabolic Comorbidities Treated with Once-Monthly Paliperidone Palmitate vs. Oral Atypical Antipsychotics

机译:每月一次帕潘立酮棕榈酸酯治疗精神分裂症和心脏代谢合并症的医疗补助受益者的经济影响与口服非典型抗精神病药的关系

获取原文
           

摘要

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to compare persistence, costs, and healthcare resource utilization in patients with schizophrenia and cardiometabolic comorbidities treated with once-monthly paliperidone palmitate or an oral atypical antipsychotic. MethodsMedicaid data from six states (07/2009–03/2015) were used to identify adults with schizophrenia and cardiometabolic comorbidities initiated on once-monthly paliperidone palmitate or an oral atypical antipsychotic (index date) on 01/2010 or after. Persistence to index medication at 12?months (no gap?≥?90?days) was compared between patients taking once-monthly paliperidone palmitate and an oral atypical antipsychotic using Chi-squared tests. The 12-month post-index healthcare costs and healthcare resource utilization were compared using multivariate ordinary least squares and Poisson regression, respectively. ResultsSelected patients taking once-monthly paliperidone palmitate ( n =?371) were younger (mean age: 45.0 vs. 47.5?years, standardized difference?=?24%) than patients taking oral atypical antipsychotics ( n =?8296). Persistence at 12?months was higher in patients taking once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (40 vs. 33%, p =?0.006). Adjusted all-cause medical costs were lower in patients taking once-monthly paliperidone palmitate vs. patients taking oral atypical antipsychotics (mean monthly cost differences?=?US $???369, p =?0.004) while all-cause pharmacy costs were higher (mean monthly cost differences?=?US $279, p ConclusionsMedicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia and cardiometabolic comorbidities who were initiated on once-monthly paliperidone palmitate had similar 12-month total healthcare costs compared with oral atypical antipsychotics. Cardiometabolic comorbidity-related utilization of inpatient and long-term care services was lower in patients taking once-monthly paliperidone palmitate.
机译:目的本研究的目的是比较每月一次使用帕潘立酮棕榈酸酯或非典型抗精神病药治疗的精神分裂症和心脏代谢合并症患者的持续性,费用和医疗资源利用率。方法使用来自六个州(07 / 2009–03 / 2015)的医疗数据,确定在01/2010或之后每月一次使用帕潘立酮棕榈酸酯或口服非典型抗精神病药(索引日期)引发的精神分裂症和心脏代谢合并症。使用卡方检验比较了每月服用一次帕潘立酮棕榈酸酯和口服非典型抗精神病药的患者在12个月(无间隔≥90天内)对索引药物的持久性。分别使用多元普通最小二乘和Poisson回归比较了12个月后指数的医疗保健成本和医疗保健资源利用率。结果选定的每月一次服用帕潘立酮棕榈酸酯(n = 371)的患者比接受口服非典型抗精神病药的患者(n = 8296)年轻(平均年龄:45.0 vs. 47.5?年,标准差?=?24%)。每月一次服用帕潘立酮棕榈酸酯的患者在12个月时的持久性更高(40%vs. 33%,p =?0.006)。每月服用一次帕潘立酮棕榈酸酯的患者调整后的全因医疗费用要比口服非典型抗精神病药的患者低(平均每月费用差异为369美元,p = 0.004),而全因药房费用为较高(平均每月成本差异?=?US $ 279,p结论)与口服非典型抗精神病药相比,每月一次帕潘立酮棕榈酸酯引发的精神分裂症和心脏代谢合并症的医疗补助受益人的12个月总医疗费用相似。每月一次服用帕潘立酮棕榈酸酯的患者的长期护理服务较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号