首页> 外文期刊>Dynamic Chiropractic >Best for the Profession or Best for the Public?
【24h】

Best for the Profession or Best for the Public?

机译:最适合专业还是最适合公众?

获取原文
           

摘要

Recently, I had the privilege of testifying for the chiropractic physicians in New Mexico who currently have some prescriptive rights and wished to expand that scope to improve their ability to provide stronger, more complete primary care. It should be clear that I was asked to appear in behalf of the chiropractic physicians there or I would not have been there. It is not my purpose, as president of National University of Health Sciences, to dictate the direction of the chiropractic profession, but to provide the education that is required by the profession.
机译:最近,我荣幸地为新墨西哥州的脊椎治疗医师作证,他们目前拥有一些规定性的权利,并希望扩大这一范围,以提高他们提供更强大,更完整的初级护理的能力。应当明确的是,我被要求代表那里的脊椎治疗医生出现,否则我就不会去过那里。作为国立卫生科学大学校长,我的目的不是指示脊骨疗法专业的方向,而是提供该专业所需的教育。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号