首页> 外文期刊>Drug Design, Development and Therapy >Neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations in children born after dydrogesterone application in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF: a retrospective cohort study
【24h】

Neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations in children born after dydrogesterone application in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF: a retrospective cohort study

机译:孕激素引发的IVF卵巢刺激方案中应用孕酮治疗后患儿的新生儿结局和先天畸形:一项回顾性队列研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose: Dydrogesterone (DYG) has been demonstrated to be an alternative progestin in the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol with comparable oocyte retrieval and pregnancy outcomes. However, its safety regarding neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations is still unclear. Patients and methods: This retrospective cohort study included 3556 live-born infants after in vitro fertilization and vitrified embryo transfer cycles using the DYG?+?human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) protocol (n=1429) or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-agonist short protocol (n=2127) from January 2014 to December 2017. Newborn information was gathered from standardized follow-up questionnaires and/or access to medical records within 7?days after birth. Associations between ovarian stimulation protocols and outcome measures were analyzed by binary logistic regression after adjusting for confounding factors. Results: In both singletons and twins, birth characteristics regarding mode of delivery, newborn gender, gestational age, birthweight, length at birth and Z-scores were comparable between the two protocols. For adverse neonatal outcomes, the two protocols showed no significant differences on the rates of low birthweight, very low birthweight, preterm birth, very preterm birth, small-for-gestational age, large-for-gestational age and early neonatal death after adjustment. Furthermore, the incidence of major congenital malformations in the DYG?+?hMG protocol (1.12%) was similar to that in the GnRH-agonist short protocol (1.08%), with the adjusted odds ratio of 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40–2.39) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.33–2.41) in singletons and twins, respectively. Conclusion: Our data suggested that compared with the conventional GnRH-agonist short protocol, application of DYG in the PPOS protocol was a safe option for the newborn population without compromising neonatal outcomes or increasing congenital malformation risks.
机译:目的:在孕激素引发的卵巢刺激(PPOS)方案中,屈孕酮(DYG)已被证明是一种替代性孕激素,具有可比的卵母细胞回收率和妊娠结局。但是,其在新生儿结局和先天性畸形方面的安全性尚不清楚。患者和方法:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了3556名活体外出生的婴儿,这些婴儿经过体外受精和玻璃化胚胎移植周期后使用DYGα+人类绝经促性腺激素(hMG)方案(n = 1429)或促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)从2014年1月至2017年12月采用激动剂短期治疗方案(n = 2127)。从标准化的后续调查表和/或在出生后7天内访问医疗记录中收集新生儿信息。调整混杂因素后,通过二元logistic回归分析卵巢刺激方案与结果指标之间的关联。结果:在单胎和双胎中,两种方案在分娩方式,新生儿性别,胎龄,出生体重,出生时长和Z评分方面的出生特征均相当。对于新生儿不良结局,两种方案在调整后的低出生体重,极低出生体重,早产,极早出生,小胎龄,大胎龄和早期新生儿死亡率方面没有显着差异。此外,DYGα+ΔhMG方案中主要先天畸形的发生率(1.12%)与GnRH-激动剂短方案中的发生率(1.08%)相似,调整后的优势比为0.98(95%置信区间[CI] ]:单胎和双胎分别为0.40–2.39)和0.90(95%CI:0.33–2.41)。结论:我们的数据表明,与常规GnRH激动剂短方案相比,DYG在PPOS方案中的应用对于新生儿人群是一种安全的选择,而不会损害新生儿结局或增加先天性畸形的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号