首页> 外文期刊>Drug Design, Development and Therapy >Efficacy and pharmacokinetic activity of frovatriptan compared to rizatriptan in patients with moderate-to-severe migraine
【24h】

Efficacy and pharmacokinetic activity of frovatriptan compared to rizatriptan in patients with moderate-to-severe migraine

机译:弗罗曲普坦与利扎曲普坦相比在中度至重度偏头痛患者中的疗效和药代动力学活性

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Migraine is a painful neurological disorder that affects over 10% of the general population. Frovatriptan and rizatriptan are antimigraine agents belonging to the triptan class. Although previous studies have independently compared the efficacy of these agents, contemporaneous data examining both pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and efficacy in parallel have not previously been available.Materials and methods: In this single-center double-blind study, 18 subjects (ten female) were treated for a single migraine attack with frovatriptan 2.5 mg or rizatriptan 10 mg. Plasma concentrations were measured predose and at 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after drug administration. The primary end point of this study was to evaluate the association between PK parameters and efficacy measures and recurrence rate. Secondary end points were pain-free and pain-relief episodes at 2 and 4 hours, recurrent episodes within 48 hours, and cumulative hazard of recurrence within 72 hours.Results: At baseline, approximately 17% of patients had mild migraine, while 83% had moderate–severe migraine. Although the time to maximum concentration was similar for both drugs (2.7 versus 2.3 hours), the terminal half-life for frovatriptan was longer than rizatriptan (29.3 versus 3.2 hours, P<0.0001). The proportion of patients who were pain-free at 4 hours without rescue medication was higher in the frovatriptan-treated group, (38.9 versus 5.6%, P=0.045). The cumulative hazard of recurrence over 72 h was reduced by frovatriptan compared to rizatriptan-treated patients (log-rank test, P=0.04). Pain-free and pain-relief episodes for the study period were positively correlated with the concentration:maximum concentration (Cmax) ratio for frovatriptan (r=0.52, P=0.028), but not rizatriptan. Recurrence rate was negatively correlated with the concentration:Cmax ratio for both frovatriptan (r=?0.96, P=0.0024) and rizatriptan (r=?0.98, P=0.0004). Fewer adverse events were observed for frovatriptan compared to rizatriptan (one versus eight, P=0.021).Conclusion: This pilot study indicates that a similar extent of initial pain relief is afforded by both triptans in migraine treatment. The longer duration of action of frovatriptan parallels and correlates with its PK profile.
机译:背景:偏头痛是一种痛苦的神经系统疾病,影响了超过10%的普通人群。 Frovatriptan和rizatriptan是属于曲普坦类的抗偏头痛药物。尽管以前的研究已经独立比较了这些药物的功效,但同时尚无同时研究药代动力学(PK)特性和功效的同期数据。材料和方法:在该单中心双盲研究中,有18名受试者(十名女性) )分别以2.5毫克(frovatriptan)或10毫克(rizatriptan)服用rizatriptan治疗单次偏头痛发作。给药前,给药后2、4、6、12、24、48和72小时测量血浆浓度。这项研究的主要目的是评估PK参数与疗效指标和复发率之间的关系。次要终点是2小时和4小时无疼痛和缓解疼痛发作,48小时内复发发作以及72小时内累积复发危险。结果:在基线时,约17%的患者患有轻度偏头痛,而83%的患者患有中度至重度偏头痛。尽管两种药物达到最大浓度的时间相似(2.7对2.3小时),但氟伐曲坦的终末半衰期比利扎曲普坦更长(29.3对3.2小时,P <0.0001)。在弗罗曲曲坦治疗组中,在4小时内无急救药物而无疼痛的患者比例更高(38.9对5.6%,P = 0.045)。与利扎曲普坦治疗的患者相比,frovatriptan降低了72小时内的累积复发风险(对数秩检验,P = 0.04)。在研究期间,无痛和缓解疼痛的发作与氟伐曲坦的浓度:最大浓度(Cmax)比呈正相关(r = 0.52,P = 0.028),但与利扎曲普坦无关。弗罗曲曲普坦(r =?0.96,P = 0.0024)和利扎曲普坦(r =?0.98,P = 0.0004)的复发率均与浓度:Cmax比值呈负相关。与利扎曲普坦相比,氟哌曲普坦的不良事件更少(1比8,P = 0.021)。结论:这项初步研究表明,在偏头痛治疗中,两种曲普坦都能减轻类似的初期疼痛。夫曲曲普坦的作用时间更长,与它的PK曲线相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号