首页> 外文期刊>Drug Design, Development and Therapy >Pharmacokinetic comparison of a fixed-dose combination versus concomitant administration of fimasartan, amlodipine, and rosuvastatin using partial replicated design in healthy adult subjects
【24h】

Pharmacokinetic comparison of a fixed-dose combination versus concomitant administration of fimasartan, amlodipine, and rosuvastatin using partial replicated design in healthy adult subjects

机译:在健康成人受试者中使用部分复制设计的固定剂量联合用药与氟马沙坦,氨氯地平和瑞舒伐他汀同时给药的药代动力学比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety profiles of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) formulation of fimasartan, amlodipine, and rosuvastatin with the co-administration of the two products by using a replicated crossover study design in healthy male subjects. Materials and methods: This was an open-label, randomized, three-sequence, three-period replicated crossover study in healthy male subjects. The replicated crossover design was done because of high coefficient of variation of PK parameter for fimasartan, that is, >30%. With a 14 days washout period, an FDC tablet containing 60 mg fimasartan, 10 mg amlodipine, and 20 mg rosuvastatin was administered only once, and separate formulations of fimasartan/amlodipine 60 mg/10 mg FDC tablet and 20 mg rosuvastatin tablet administered twice. Blood samples were collected up to 72 hours following drug administration. The plasma concentrations of fimasartan, amlodipine, and rosuvastatin were measured by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Safety was assessed by evaluating vital signs, clinical laboratory parameters, physical examinations, and medical interviews. Results: The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve from time zero to the last measurable sampling time (AUCt) were 1.0776 (0.9201–1.2622) and 0.9978 (0.9538–1.0439) for fimasartan, 1.0038 (0.9782–1.0301) and 1.0055 (0.9828–1.0288) for amlodipine, and 1.0006 (0.9290–1.0776) and 0.9986 (0.9532–1.0461) for rosuvastatin, respectively. A total of 22 adverse events (AEs) were reported by 60 subjects; there were no significant differences in the incidence of AEs between the two groups. Conclusion: The 90% CI of the Cmax of fimasartan was within the widened acceptance limit, ln(0.6984)–ln(1.4319). The 90% CIs of the other PK parameters for drugs were between ln(0.8) and ln(1.25). These results suggest that the FDC formulation is pharmacokinetically bioequivalent and has a similar safety profile, to the co-administration of its three constituent drugs.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是通过重复交叉研究比较固定剂量联合使用的氟马沙坦,氨氯地平和罗苏伐他汀的固定剂量组合(FDC)制剂与两种产品的共同使用的药代动力学(PK)和安全性健康男性受试者的健康设计。材料和方法:这是在健康男性受试者中进行的开放标签,随机,三序列,三期重复交叉研究。之所以进行重复的交叉设计,是因为菲马沙坦的PK参数的变异系数较高,即> 30%。在14天的清除期中,仅一次施用包含60 mg氟马沙坦,10 mg氨氯地平和20 mg罗舒伐他汀的FDC片剂,并分别施用两次氟马沙坦/氨氯地平60 mg / 10 mg FDC片剂和20 mg罗舒伐他汀片剂。给药后72小时内收集血样。氟马沙坦,氨氯地平和瑞舒伐他汀的血浆浓度通过液相色谱串联质谱法测定。通过评估生命体征,临床实验室参数,体格检查和医疗访问来评估安全性。结果:从零时间到最后可测量的采样时间(AUC t)的最大血浆浓度(C max )和曲线下面积的几何平均比率和90%置信区间(CIs) )分别为:Fimasartan为1.0776(0.9201-1.2622)和0.9978(0.9538-1.0439),氨氯地平为1.0038(0.9782-1.0301)和1.0055(0.9828-1.0288),以及1.0006(0.9290-1.0776)和0.9986(0.9532-罗苏伐他汀分别为1.0461)。 60名受试者报告了总共22次不良事件(AE)。两组之间的AE发生率无显着差异。结论:氟马沙坦C max 的90%CI在扩大的接受限ln(0.6984)–ln(1.4319)内。药物的其他PK参数的90%CI在ln(0.8)和ln(1.25)之间。这些结果表明,FDC制剂与其三种成分药物的共同给药在药代动力学上是生物等效的,并且具有相似的安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号