首页> 外文期刊>Drug Design, Development and Therapy >Comparison of posttransplant outcomes in patients with no, acute, or chronic amiodarone use before heart transplantation
【24h】

Comparison of posttransplant outcomes in patients with no, acute, or chronic amiodarone use before heart transplantation

机译:心脏移植前不使用,急性或慢性使用胺碘酮的患者移植后结局的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Major concerns about the safety of pretransplant amiodarone use have been raised. As a result of its long half-life, the cardiac allograft is exposed to amiodarone posing potential risks such as bradycardia, requirement for pacemaker implantation, or increased mortality after heart transplantation (HTX). Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the posttransplant outcomes of patients with no, acute, or chronic amiodarone use before HTX. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 530 adult patients who received HTX between 06/1989 and 12/2012. Patients were stratified by their amiodarone therapy before HTX: no continuous amiodarone use (≤90 days before HTX), acute amiodarone use (≤90 days before HTX), and chronic amiodarone use (>90 days before HTX). Differences between the 3 groups in demographics, posttransplant medication, echocardiographic features, heart rates including occurrences of bradycardia, permanent pacemaker implantation, atrial fibrillation (AF), and survival were analyzed. Results: A total of 412 patients (77.7%) were in the “no amiodarone” group, 23 patients (4.4%) in the “acute amiodarone” group, and 95 patients (17.9%) in the “chronic amiodarone” group. Left ventricular ejection fraction ( P =0.5819), heart rates including occurrence of bradycardia during posttransplant week 1 ( P =0.0979 and P =0.2695), week 2 ( P =0.1214 and P =0.8644), week 3 ( P =0.1033 and P =0.8894), and week 4 ( P =0.2892 and P =0.8644), permanent pacemaker implantation within 30-day ( P =0.8644), or overall follow-up after HTX ( P =0.8664) were not significant between groups. Patients with chronic pretransplant amiodarone therapy had the lowest rate of early posttransplant AF ( P =0.0065). There was no statistically significant difference between groups in 30-day ( P =0.8656), 1-year ( P =1.0000), 2-year ( P =0.8763), 5-year ( P =0.5174), or overall posttransplant follow-up mortality ( P =0.1936). Conclusion: Administration of acute or chronic pretransplant amiodarone was not related to an increased occurrence of bradycardia, requirement for permanent pacemaker implantation, or mortality after HTX. Importantly, chronic amiodarone use effectively reduced early AF after HTX, whereas acute amiodarone use showed no such effect.
机译:背景:人们对移植前胺碘酮使用的安全性表示出极大的关注。由于其半衰期长,心脏异体移植物暴露于胺碘酮中,构成潜在的风险,例如心动过缓,需要起搏器植入或心脏移植后死亡率增加(HTX)。目的:本研究的目的是调查HTX之前不使用,急性或慢性使用胺碘酮的患者的移植后结局。方法:这项回顾性单中心研究纳入了530名在06/1989至12/2012之间接受HTX的成年患者。患者在接受HTX之前通过胺碘酮治疗进行了分层:不连续使用胺碘酮(在HTX之前≤90天),急性使用胺碘酮(在HTX之前≤90天)和长期使用胺碘酮(在HTX之前> 90天)。分析了这三组在人口统计学,移植后药物治疗,超声心动图特征,心率(包括心动过缓的发生率),永久性起搏器植入,心房颤动(AF)和生存率之间的差异。结果:“无胺碘酮”组共有412例患者(占77.7%),“急性胺碘酮”组共有23例患者(占4.4%),“慢性胺碘酮”组有95例患者(占17.9%)。左心室射血分数(P = 0.5819),心率,包括移植后第1周(P = 0.0979和P = 0.2695),第2周(P = 0.1214和P = 0.8644),第3周(P = 0.1033和P)发生的心动过缓= 0.8894)和第4周(P = 0.2892和P = 0.8644),30天内永久性起搏器植入(P = 0.8644)或HTX术后总体随访(P = 0.8664)在各组之间均无统计学意义。慢性移植前胺碘酮治疗的患者移植后早期房颤发生率最低(P = 0.0065)。两组之间在30天(P = 0.8656),1年(P = 1.0000),2年(P = 0.8763),5年(P = 0.5174)或总体移植后随访之间无统计学差异。死亡率上升(P = 0.1936)。结论:急性或慢性移植前胺碘酮的给药与心动过缓的发生率增加,永久性起搏器植入的需要或HTX术后的死亡率无关。重要的是,慢性胺碘酮的使用有效降低了HTX后的早期房颤,而急性胺碘酮的使用则没有这种作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号