首页> 外文期刊>Drug Design, Development and Therapy >The effects of amlodipine and platelet rich plasma on bone healing in rats
【24h】

The effects of amlodipine and platelet rich plasma on bone healing in rats

机译:氨氯地平和富血小板血浆对大鼠骨愈合的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of calcium channel blocker (CCB) amlodipine (AML), platelet rich plasma (PRP), and a mixture of both materials on bone healing.Materials and methods: Fifty-six male Wistar rats were randomly divided into four groups: group A, tibia defect model with no treatment; group B, tibia defect model treated with AML, 0.04 mg daily by oral gavage; group C, tibia defect model treated with local PRP; group D, tibia defect model treated with local PRP and AML, 0.04 mg daily by oral gavage.Results: At day 21, bone healing was significantly better in groups C and D compared to group A (P0.05). At day 30, groups B and C showed no statistically significant difference (P>0.05) compared to group A, but bone healing in group D was significantly better than in group A (P0.05), but PRP and AML + PRP increased ALP activity statistically (P<0.05).Conclusion: It can be concluded that AML had neither a positive nor a negative effect on bone healing, but when used in combination with PRP, it may be beneficial.
机译:目的:本研究旨在评估钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)氨氯地平(AML),富血小板血浆(PRP)以及两种材料的混合物对骨愈合的影响。材料和方法:56名男性Wistar将大鼠随机分为四组:A组,不治疗的胫骨缺损模型; A组,不治疗的胫骨缺损模型。 B组,经AML管治疗的胫骨缺损模型,每天0.04mg经口管饲; C组,局部PRP治疗胫骨缺损模型; D组,采用局部PRP和AML处理的胫骨缺损模型,每天经口管饲0.04 mg。结果:在第21天,C和D组的骨愈合明显优于A组(P0.05)。在第30天,B和C组与A组相比无统计学差异(P> 0.05),但D组的骨愈合显着优于A组(P0.05),但PRP和AML + PRP增加了ALP结论:AML对骨愈合没有正面或负面影响,但与PRP联合使用可能是有益的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号