首页> 外文期刊>Diagnostics >Comparison of a New Multiplex Immunoassay for Measurement of Ferritin, Soluble Transferrin Receptor, Retinol-Binding Protein, C-Reactive Protein and α 1 -Acid-glycoprotein Concentrations against a Widely-Used s-ELISA Method
【24h】

Comparison of a New Multiplex Immunoassay for Measurement of Ferritin, Soluble Transferrin Receptor, Retinol-Binding Protein, C-Reactive Protein and α 1 -Acid-glycoprotein Concentrations against a Widely-Used s-ELISA Method

机译:针对广泛使用的s-ELISA方法测定铁蛋白,可溶性转铁蛋白受体,视黄醇结合蛋白,C反应蛋白和α1-酸性糖蛋白浓度的新型多重免疫测定法的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Recently, a multiplex ELISA (Quansys Biosciences) was developed that measures ferritin, soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR), retinol-binding protein (RBP), C-reactive protein (CRP), α 1 -acid glycoprotein (AGP), thyroglobulin, and histidine-rich protein 2. Our primary aim was to conduct a method-comparison study to compare five biomarkers (ferritin, sTfR, RBP, CRP, and AGP) measured with the Quansys assay and a widely-used s-ELISA (VitMin Lab, Willstaett, Germany) with use of serum samples from 180 women and children from Burkina Faso, Cambodia, and Malaysia. Bias and concordance were used to describe the agreement in values measured by the two methods. We observed poor overall agreement between the methods, both with regard to biomarker concentrations and deficiency prevalence estimates. Several measurements were outside of the limit of detection with use of the Quansys ELISA (total n = 42 for ferritin, n = 2 for sTfR, n = 0 for AGP, n = 5 for CRP, n = 22 for RBP), limiting our ability to interpret assay findings. Although the Quansys ELISA has great potential to simplify laboratory analysis of key nutritional and inflammation biomarkers, there are some weaknesses in the procedures. Overall, we found poor comparability of results between methods. Besides addressing procedural issues, additional validation of the Quansys against a gold standard method is warranted for future research.
机译:最近,开发了一种多重ELISA(Quansys Biosciences),可测量铁蛋白,可溶性转铁蛋白受体(sTfR),视黄醇结合蛋白(RBP),C反应蛋白(CRP),α1-酸性糖蛋白(AGP),甲状腺球蛋白和富含组氨酸的蛋白质2。我们的主要目的是进行方法比较研究,以比较使用Quansys测定法和广泛使用的s-ELISA(VitMin实验室,VitMin Lab,Inc.)测定的五个生物标志物(铁蛋白,sTfR,RBP,CRP和AGP)。 (德国Willstaett)使用来自布基纳法索,柬埔寨和马来西亚的180名妇女和儿童的血清样本。偏差和一致性用​​于描述通过两种方法测得的值的一致性。我们观察到在生物标志物浓度和缺乏症患病率估计方面,这些方法之间的总体一致性差。使用Quansys ELISA进行的几次测量超出了检测极限(铁蛋白总计n = 42,sTfR n = 2,AGP n = 0,CRP n = 5,RBP n = 22)解释化验结果的能力。尽管Quansys ELISA具有简化重要营养和炎症生物标记物实验室分析的巨大潜力,但该程序仍存在一些不足。总体而言,我们发现方法之间结果的可比性很差。除了解决程序问题外,还需要针对黄金标准方法对Quansys进行其他验证,以供将来研究之用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号