首页> 外文期刊>Diabetologia: clinical and experimental diabetes and metabolism >In type 2 diabetes, randomisation to advice to follow a low-carbohydrate diet transiently improves glycaemic control compared with advice to follow a low-fat diet producing a similar weight loss
【24h】

In type 2 diabetes, randomisation to advice to follow a low-carbohydrate diet transiently improves glycaemic control compared with advice to follow a low-fat diet producing a similar weight loss

机译:在2型糖尿病患者中,与遵循低脂饮食产生相似体重减轻的建议相比,随机建议接受低碳水化合物饮食可以改善血糖控制

获取原文
       

摘要

Aims/hypothesis The study aimed to compare the effects of a 2?year intervention with a low-fat diet (LFD) or a low-carbohydrate diet (LCD), based on four group meetings to achieve compliance. Methods This was a prospective randomised parallel trial involving 61 adults with type 2 diabetes consecutively recruited in primary care and randomised by drawing ballots. Patients that did not speak Swedish could not be recruited. The primary outcomes in this non-blinded study were weight and HbA1c. Patients on the LFD aimed for 55–60 energy per cent (E%) and those on LCD for 20?E% from carbohydrate. Results The mean BMI and HbA1c of the participants were 32.7?±?5.4?kg/m2 and 57.0?±?9.2?mmol/mol, respectively. No patients were lost to follow-up. Weight loss did not differ between groups and was maximal at 6?months: LFD ?3.99?±?4.1?kg (n?=?31); LCD ?4.31?±?3.6?kg (n?=?30); p?p?=?0.002 and p?=?0.020 within groups, respectively). HbA1c fell in the LCD group only (LCD at 6?months ?4.8?±?8.3?mmol/mol, p?=?0.004, at 12?months ?2.2?±?7.7?mmol/mol, p?=?0.12; LFD at 6?months ?0.9?±?8.8?mmol/mol, p?=?0.56). At 6?months, HDL-cholesterol had increased with the LCD (from 1.13?±?0.33?mmol/l to 1.25?±?0.47?mmol/l, p?=?0.018) while LDL-cholesterol did not differ between groups. Insulin doses were reduced in the LCD group (0?months, LCD 42?±?65 E, LFD 39?±?51 E; 6?months, LCD 30?±?47 E, LFD 38?±?48 E; p?=?0.046 for between-group change). Conclusions/interpretation Weight changes did not differ between the diet groups, while insulin doses were reduced significantly more with the LCD at 6?months, when compliance was good. Thus, aiming for 20% of energy intake from carbohydrates is safe with respect to cardiovascular risk compared with the traditional LFD and this approach could constitute a treatment alternative. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01005498 Funding: University Hospital of Link?ping Research Funds, Link?ping University, the County Council of ?sterg?tland, and the Diabetes Research Centre of Link?ping University
机译:目的/假设该研究旨在比较为期2年的低脂饮食(LFD)或低碳水化合物饮食(LCD)干预的效果,以达到合规性。方法这是一项前瞻性随机平行试验,涉及61名2型糖尿病成人,这些成人连续被选入初级保健并通过抽签进行随机分组。不会说瑞典语的患者无法招募。这项非盲研究的主要结果是体重和HbA1c。使用LFD的患者的目标是55%至60%的能量(E %),而使用LCD的患者的目标是20%E%的碳水化合物。结果参与者的平均BMI和HbA1c分别为32.7±±5.4μkg/ m2和57.0±±9.2μmmol/ mol。没有患者失去随访。两组之间的体重减轻没有差异,并且在6个月时达到最大:LFD≤3.99≤±4.1 kg(n = 31)。液晶屏:4.31±3.6公斤(n = 30);组内的p≥p≥0.002和p​​≥0.020)。 HbA1c仅在LCD组下降(LCD在6个月时为4.8?±8.3?mmol / mol,p?=?0.004,在12个月时为?2.2 ?? 7.7?mmol / mol,p?=?0.12 ; LFD在6个月≤0.9≤±8.8≤mmol/ mol,p≤0.56。在6个月时,高密度脂蛋白胆固醇随LCD升高(从1.13?±?0.33?mmol / l增加至1.25?±?0.47?mmol / l,p?=?0.018),而各组之间的LDL胆固醇无差异。 LCD组的胰岛素剂量减少(0?月,LCD 42?±?65 E,LFD 39?±?51 E; 6?月,LCD 30?±?47 E,LFD 38?±?48 E; p组间变化的α= 0.046)。结论/解释饮食组之间的体重变化无差异,而当依从性良好时,在6个月时使用LCD显着降低胰岛素剂量。因此,与传统的LFD相比,针对心血管疾病的风险,针对碳水化合物摄入20%的能量是安全的,这种方法可以构成一种治疗选择。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01005498经费资助:林平大学研究基金,林平大学,斯特兰县议会和林平大学糖尿病研究中心

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号