首页> 外文期刊>Diabetology and Metabolic Syndrome >Efficacy and safety of vildagliptin, Saxagliptin or Sitagliptin as add-on therapy in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with dual combination of traditional oral hypoglycemic agents
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of vildagliptin, Saxagliptin or Sitagliptin as add-on therapy in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with dual combination of traditional oral hypoglycemic agents

机译:维达列汀,沙格列汀或西他列汀作为中国传统口服降糖药双重控制不足的2型糖尿病患者的附加治疗的有效性和安全性

获取原文
       

摘要

Background The oral DPP-4 inhibitors are new incretin-based therapies for treatment of type 2 diabetes. To assess the efficacy and safety of three DPP-4 inhibitors (Saxagliptin, Sitagliptin and Vildagliptin) as add-on therapy to dual combination of traditional oral hypoglycemic agents in Chinese type 2 diabetes patients. Methods In this 24-week, randomized, open-label, parallel clinical trial, we enrolled inadequately controlled (glycosylated haemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] ≥7.5% to ≤10%) patients with type 2 diabetes, who were treated by dual combination of metformin and another traditional oral hypoglycemic agent (glimepiride, acarbose or pioglitazone). 207 patients had been randomized to add-on 5 mg saxagliptin group or 100 mg sitagliptin once daily group, or 50 mg vildagliptin twice daily group for 24 weeks. HbA1c, fasting and postprandial blood glucose (FBG and P2hBG), body weight, body mass index (BMI), episodes of hypoglycemia and adverse events were evaluated. Result After 24 weeks, HbA1c, FBG, and P2hBG of each group were significantly decreased. (saxagliptin vs vildagliptin vs sitagliptin: HbA1c: -1.2% vs -1.3% vs -1.1%; FBG: -1.8 mmol/l vs -2.4 mmol/l vs -1.5 mmol/l; P2hBG: -3.4 mmol/l vs -3.7 mmol/l vs -3.2 mmol/l). The changes of HbA1c and P2hBG among the three groups had no significance. However, vildagliptin-added group showed the greatest reduction (p?
机译:背景口服DPP-4抑制剂是用于治疗2型糖尿病的新的基于肠降血糖素的疗法。评估三种DPP-4抑制剂(沙格列汀,西他列汀和维格列汀)作为中国2型糖尿病患者传统口服降糖药双重联合治疗的疗效和安全性。方法在这项为期24周的随机,开放标签,平行临床试验中,我们纳入了二甲双胍双重联合治疗的2型糖尿病患者(糖化血红蛋白A1c [HbA1c]≥7.5%至≤10%)控制不充分以及另一种传统的口服降糖药(格列美脲,阿卡波糖或吡格列酮)。 207名患者被随机分配至5 mg沙格列汀组或100 mg西他列汀每天一次组,或50 mg维达列汀每天两次组,共24周。评估了HbA1c,空腹和餐后血糖(FBG和P2hBG),体重,体重指数(BMI),低血糖发作和不良事件。结果24周后,各组的HbA1c,FBG和P2hBG均明显降低。 (沙格列汀vs维达列汀vs西他列汀:HbA1c:-1.2%vs -1.3%vs -1.1%; FBG:-1.8 mmol / l vs -2.4 mmol / l vs -1.5 mmol / l; P2hBG:-3.4 mmol / l vs- 3.7mmol / l对-3.2mmol / l)。三组间HbA1c和P2hBG的变化无统计学意义。然而,就FPG变化而言,添加维达列汀的组显示出最大的降低(p≤0.001),而添加西格列汀的组显示出最小的降低(p≤0.001)。三组患者最终达到HbA1c 7%的患者比例相似(沙格列汀59%,维格列汀65%,西他列汀59%)。三组患者中普遍报告有轻度低血糖症(沙格列汀6%,维格列汀2%,西他列汀3%)。在其他不良事件中,没有显示出显着的组间差异。结论三种脂肪素显示出几乎相似的血糖控制和不良事件发生率。但是,对于FBG的控制,沙格列汀比西他列汀具有优越性,而维格列汀则不如西格列汀。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号