首页> 外文期刊>Der Pharmacia Lettre >The Effect of Low-Flux and High-Flux Filters on Adequacy and Complications during Hemodialysis of Patients
【24h】

The Effect of Low-Flux and High-Flux Filters on Adequacy and Complications during Hemodialysis of Patients

机译:低通量和高通量过滤器对患者血液透析过程中充分性和并发症的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

In case of inadequacy, hemodialysis, as one of the most common treatments for chronic renal failure, increases the blood toxins, complications, hospital stay, costs, and death. High-Flux filters can be effective in increasing hemodialysis adequacy if the patients tolerate and do not display complications. Therefore, this article aimed to study the efficiency of these dialyzers in increasing the dialysis adequacy compared with the complications and tolerance of hemodialysis patients. This is a single-group quasi-experimental study during which all 22 patients underwent hemodialysis three times a week for four hours for six months. They consented to participate in the study. They underwent dialysis for 4 sessions with Low-Flux filter and then 4 sessions with High-Flux filters. In each session, the patients were investigated by a checklist during the hemodialysis. In the fourth session, dialysis adequacy was measured for each patient. The mean score of dialysis adequacy in Low-Flux stage was 0.83±0.48. It was 1.02±0.064 in High-Flux stage, though. According to the Paired Sample Test, the difference was significant (p=0.006). According to the McNamara's test, the incidence of nausea and vomiting, headache, muscle cramps, etc. was not significant between Low-Flux and High-Flux modes (P0.05). Systolic blood pressure changes were increasing in both mentioned modes which was not statistically significant (P0.05). Conclusion: In addition to increasing the dialysis adequacy, using High-Flux filter is a better choice than Low-Flux filter due to no complications for hemodialysis patients.
机译:在血液透析不足的情况下,血液透析作为慢性肾衰竭的最常见治疗方法之一,会增加血液毒素,并发症,住院时间,费用和死亡。如果患者能够耐受并且不显示并发症,高通量过滤器可以有效地增加血液透析的充分性。因此,本文旨在研究这些透析器与血液透析患者的并发症和耐受性相比在提高透析充分性方面的效率。这是一个单组的准实验研究,在此研究中,所有22位患者每周进行3次血液透析,持续6个月,共四个小时。他们同意参加这项研究。他们使用低通量过滤器进行透析4次,然后使用高通量过滤器透析4次。在每个疗程中,在血液透析期间通过检查表对患者进行检查。在第四届会议中,对每位患者的透析充分性进行了测量。低通量阶段透析充分性的平均得分为0.83±0.48。在高通量阶段为1.02±0.064。根据配对样品测试,差异显着(p = 0.006)。根据McNamara检验,在低通量和高通量模式之间,恶心和呕吐,头痛,肌肉抽筋等的发生率均不显着(P> 0.05)。在上述两种模式中,收缩压的变化都在增加,但无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。结论:除了增加透析充分性之外,使用高通量过滤器比低通量过滤器更好,因为血液透析患者没有并发症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号