...
首页> 外文期刊>Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics >Biosafety conducts adopted by orthodontists
【24h】

Biosafety conducts adopted by orthodontists

机译:牙齿矫正医生采取的生物安全行为

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: This cross-sectional observational study was designed to assess the biosafety conducts adopted by orthodontists, and possible differences regarding training time. Methods: Both the application of methods for sterilization/disinfection of instruments and materials, and the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) were collected through questionnaires via e-mail. Results: The questionnaires were answered by 90 orthodontists with a mean age of 37.19 ± 9.08 years and mean training time of 13.52 ± 6.84 years. Regarding orthodontic pliers, 63.23% use an autoclave, except 1 who does not perform any procedure. All participants use autoclave to sterilize instruments, and 95.6% of respondents perform cleaning with chemicals prior to sterilization. Most of them (65.56%) use an autoclave to sterilize orthodontic bands, with some still associating disinfection methods, while few (18.89%) do nothing at all. There was a high incidence of the answer “nothing” for the methods used for elastic, accessories, bandages, metal springs, and arches. All respondents use mask and gloves in attendance, 78.92% use aprons, 58.92% use protective goggles, and 50.01% use cap. Training time significantly influenced ( p = 0.003) only the use of glutaraldehyde for sterilization/disinfection of pliers. Conclusions: The sterilization and cleaning of pliers, instruments, and bands, besides the use of PPE, received more uniform and positive responses, while other items suggest disagreements and possible failures. Only orthodontists trained for more than 13 years choose using glutaraldehyde for pliers sterilization/disinfection, the only adopted method with a significant difference in relation to training time.
机译:目的:这项横断面观察研究旨在评估正畸医生采用的生物安全行为以及培训时间上可能存在的差异。方法:通过电子邮件通过问卷调查收集用于器械和材料灭菌/消毒的方法以及使用个人防护设备(PPE)的情况。结果:90名正畸医生回答了问卷,平均年龄为37.19±9.08岁,平均培训时间为13.52±6.84岁。对于正畸钳子,有63.23%的人使用高压灭菌器,除了1个不执行任何程序。所有参与者都使用高压灭菌器对器械进行了消毒,并且95.6%的受访者在消毒之前用化学药品进行了清洁。他们中的大多数人(65.56%)使用高压灭菌器对正畸牙带进行消毒,其中一些仍与消毒方法相关联,而很少人(18.89%)却什么也不做。弹性,附件,绷带,金属弹簧和弓形方法的回答“无”的发生率很高。所有受访者都使用口罩和手套,其中78.92%使用围裙,58.92%使用护目镜,50.01%使用帽子。仅使用戊二醛对钳子进行灭菌/消毒时,培训时间会显着影响(p = 0.003)。结论:钳子,仪器和带子的消毒和清洁除使用PPE外,得到了更统一和积极的回应,而其他项目则表明存在分歧和可能的失败。只有经过13年以上培训的正畸医生才选择使用戊二醛进行钳子杀菌/消毒,这是唯一采用的与培训时间有显着差异的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号