首页> 外文期刊>Hong Kong medical journal = >Impact of nuchal cord on fetal outcomes, mode of delivery, and management: a questionnaire survey of pregnant women
【24h】

Impact of nuchal cord on fetal outcomes, mode of delivery, and management: a questionnaire survey of pregnant women

机译:脐带对胎儿结局,分娩方式和管理的影响:对孕妇的问卷调查

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives: To explore pregnant women’s views on the impact of nuchal cord on fetal outcomes, mode of delivery, and management. Design: Questionnaire survey. Setting: Antenatal clinic of two regional hospitals in Hong Kong. Participants: A questionnaire survey of all pregnant women at their first visit to the antenatal clinic of United Christian Hospital and Tseung Kwan O Hospital in Hong Kong was conducted between August and October 2012. Results: Most participants (71.8%) were worried about nuchal cord, and 78.3% and 87.7% of them thought that nuchal cord could cause intrauterine death and fetal death during labour, respectively. Approximately 87.5% of participants thought that nuchal cord would reduce the chance of successful vaginal delivery and 56.4% thought that it would increase the chance of assisted vaginal delivery. Most (94.1%) participants thought that it was necessary to have an ultrasound scan at term to detect nuchal cord. In addition, 68.8% thought that it was necessary to deliver the fetus early and 72.8% thought that caesarean section must be performed in the presence of nuchal cord. Participants born in Mainland China were significantly more worried about the presence of nuchal cord than those born in Hong Kong. However, there was no difference between participants with different levels of education. Conclusion: Most participants were worried about the presence of nuchal cord. Many thought that nuchal cord would lead to adverse fetal outcomes, affect the mode of delivery, and require special management. These misconceptions should be addressed and proper education of women is needed. New knowledge added by this study Most women were worried about the presence of nuchal cord. Many women thought that nuchal cord would lead to adverse fetal outcomes, affect the mode of delivery, and require special management. Implications for clinical practice or policy Avoiding routine ultrasound scans for nuchal cord in order to reduce needless maternal anxiety and unnecessary caesarean sections on women’s request is warranted. The correct concept that nuchal cord would not normally lead to adverse fetal outcomes and that its presence should not affect the mode of delivery should be publicised widely in Hong Kong. [in Chinese] Introduction In daily clinical practice, pregnant women regularly request antenatal ultrasound scans to look for nuchal cord around the time of delivery or request that the presence of nuchal cord is specifically checked for when they undergo ultrasound scans for other obstetric reasons. Many women have requested elective caesarean sections because nuchal cord has been detected on ultrasound scan. In order to explore women’s views on the impact of nuchal cord on fetal outcomes, mode of delivery and management, we conducted a questionnaire survey to evaluate their true concerns and beliefs. Methods A questionnaire evaluating the impact of nuchal cord on fetal outcomes and mode of delivery were distributed to all pregnant women at their first antenatal visit to the out-patient clinic of United Christian Hospital and Tseung Kwan O Hospital from August to October 2012. The questionnaire was in three versions: traditional Chinese, simplified Chinese, and English according to the participant’s preference ( Appendices 1 to 3 ). Participants who were not able to understand Chinese or English were excluded from the study. The questionnaires were collected by the nursing staff immediately after completion. Assuming that 50% of the women would express concern about the presence of nuchal cord, a sample size of 357 women would allow for random errors of up to 5%. Assuming the response rate to the questionnaire to be around 80%, distribution of around 450 questionnaires would be sufficient. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (Windows version 20.0; SPSS Inc, Chicago [IL], US) was used for statistical analysis. Chi squared test and Fisher’s exact test were used when appropriate. All the differences were defined as being statistically significant at PTable 1. Demographic data of the participants (n=869) Table 2. Comparison of the demographic data of participants who were concerned about nuchal cord The perceived incidence of nuchal cord was assessed by a linear scale from 0% to 100%. Excluding the 50 participants who did not reply to this question, 37.9% thought that the incidence of nuchal cord was less than 20%. The perceived sonographic accuracy for nuchal cord was similarly assessed. Around one third (31.2%) of participants thought that the accuracy was less than 70% while 35 participants did not answer this question. The perceived impact of nuchal cord on fetal outcomes, mode of delivery, and management are shown in Table 3 . Around 78.3% and 87.7% thought that nuchal cord could cause intrauterine death and fetal death during labour, respectively, while 87.5% of participants thought that it would reduce the chance of successful vaginal delivery and 56.4% thought that it would inc
机译:目的:探讨孕妇对脐带对胎儿结局,分娩方式和管理的影响的观点。设计:问卷调查。地点:香港两家地区医院的产前诊所。参加者:2012年8月至10月,对所有孕妇首次访问香港联合医院和将军澳医院产前诊所进行了问卷调查。结果:大多数参与者(71.8%)担心脐带,其中78.3%和87.7%的人认为,脐带可能会导致分娩时子宫内死亡和胎儿死亡。大约87.5%的参与者认为,脐带会减少成功阴道分娩的机会,而56.4%的参与者认为这会增加辅助阴道分娩的机会。大多数(94.1%)的参与者认为足月需要进行超声扫描以检测脐带。此外,有68.8%的人认为有必要及早分娩胎儿,有72.8%的人认为必须在有脐带的情况下进行剖腹产。与在香港出生的参与者相比,在中国大陆出生的参与者对颈部脐带的存在更为担忧。但是,受教育程度不同的参与者之间没有区别。结论:大多数参与者担心脐带的存在。许多人认为,脐带会导致不良的胎儿结局,影响分娩方式,需要特殊处理。这些误解应当得到解决,需要对妇女进行适当的教育。这项研究增加了新的知识大多数女性都担心脐带的存在。许多妇女以为脐带会导致不良的胎儿结局,影响分娩方式并需要特殊处理。对临床实践或政策的意义为了避免不必要的产妇焦虑症和应妇女要求进行不必要的剖腹产,应避免常规的脐带超声检查。在香港应广泛宣传正确的观念,即脐带通常不会导致不良的胎儿结局,并且其存在不应影响分娩方式。引言在日常临床实践中,孕妇在分娩时会定期要求进行产前超声检查以寻找脐带,或者由于其他产科原因而要求接受超声检查时要特别检查是否存在脐带。许多妇女要求行剖腹产手术,因为在超声扫描中已检测到脐带。为了探讨妇女对脐带对胎儿结局,分娩方式和管理方式的影响的看法,我们进行了问卷调查,以评估她们的真正担忧和信念。方法2012年8月至2012年10月,在所有孕妇产前第一次访问联合医院和将军澳医院的门诊时,均分发了一份评估脐带对胎儿结局和分娩方式的影响的调查表。根据参与者的喜好分为三种版本:繁体中文,简体中文和英文(附录1至3)。不能理解中文或英文的参与者被排除在研究之外。护理人员在完成后立即收集问卷。假设有50%的女性对脐带的存在表示担忧,那么357名女性的样本量将允许高达5%的随机误差。假设对问卷的答复率在80%左右,则分发约450份问卷就足够了。社会科学统计软件包(Windows版本20.0; SPSS Inc,芝加哥[IL],美国)用于统计分析。适当时使用卡方检验和费舍尔精确检验。在表1中,所有差异均定义为具有统计学意义。表2。参与者的人口统计学数据(n = 869)表2。与关注脐带的参与者的人口统计学数据的比较通过线性评估感觉到的脐带发生率从0%扩展到100%。除50名未回答此问题的参与者外,37.9%的人认为脐带的发生率低于20%。类似地评估了感觉到的脐带超声检查准确性。大约三分之一(31.2%)的参与者认为准确度低于70%,而35名参与者没有回答这个问题。表3显示了脐带对胎儿结局,分娩方式和管理的影响。大约78.3%和87.7%的人认为脐带分娩会分别导致子宫内死亡和胎儿死亡,而87.5%的参与者认为这会减少成功分娩的机会,而56.4%的参与者认为这会增加分娩的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号