...
首页> 外文期刊>Hong Kong Practitioner: Xianggang Uankeyixueyuan Yuekan >White coat effect can be an illusion that may possibly result in sub-optimal blood pressure control?
【24h】

White coat effect can be an illusion that may possibly result in sub-optimal blood pressure control?

机译:白大褂效应可能是一种幻想,可能导致血压控制不佳?

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives: To study how accurate is the discrepancy between the home blood pressure and clinic blood pressure readings being attributed to white coat effect in hypertensive patients. Design: Cross-sectional study. Subjects: From Februar y 2015 to July 2015, we recruited hypertensive patients, who had recent three clinic visits showing elevated clinic blood pressure (BP), from the general outpatient clinics within one Hospital Authority cluster for our study. They should have had normal Home Blood Pressure Monitoring (HBPM) results and did not receive any hypertensive medication adjustment. Main outcomes: 1) The proportion of sub-optimal blood pressure control (SOBP) patients in suspected ‘White Coat Effect’ (WCE) patients. 2) The associated factors of the SOBP groups among suspected WCE patients. Methods and Resul ts: Among 112 pat ient s we recruited for the study, 106 patients completed the study. They also had undergone 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and each completed a self-administered questionnaire. After analysing the 24-hour ABPM study results, the percentage of true WCE in our study was only 58.5% and SOBP group was as high as 41.5%. Higher proportion of subjects (53.2%; p = 0.01) with true WCE was found in the groups of patients who had learnt HBPM technique from health professionals as compared to those (46.8%) who had not. There were longer histories of HBPM in the SOBP group (6.9±4.9 years) compared to those in the true WCE group (5.1±4.1 years; p=0.04). The clinic systolic blood pressure (SBP) of the subjects was slightly higher in the SOBP group (158±13 mmHg) than in the true WCE group (154±9 mmHg; p=0.04). Conclusion: In this study, substantial amount (> 40%) of patients labelled as having WCE were actually having suboptimal BP control. Therefore, 24-hour ABPM should be offered to patients who were suspected to have WCE in order to guarantee a better blood pressure control for these patients. We suggest that all patients with hypertension should attend the HBPM technique classes to have an accurate measurement of their BP. The longer the history of the home blood pressure measurement or the higher the SBP, the more likely the patients had suboptimal BP control than having WCE. Patients with HBPM should be assessed by nurses on their BP measurement technique that may reduce the proportion of suboptimal BP control in patients with suspected WCE.
机译:目的:研究高血压归因于白大褂效应的家庭血压与临床血压读数之间的差异有多准确。设计:横断面研究。研究对象:2015年2月至2015年7月,我们从一个医院管理局集群内的普通门诊诊所招募了高血压患者,这些患者最近三次就诊显示临床血压(BP)升高。他们应具有正常的家庭血压监测(HBPM)结果,并且未接受任何高血压药物调整。主要结果:1)疑似“白大褂效应”(WCE)患者中次佳血压控制(SOBP)患者的比例。 2)疑似WCE患者中SOBP组的相关因素。方法和结果:在我们招募的112名患者中,有106名患者完成了研究。他们还接受了24小时动态血压监测(ABPM),并且每个人都填写了一份自我管理的问卷。在分析24小时ABPM研究结果后,我们研究中的真实WCE百分​​比仅为58.5%,SOBP组高达41.5%。从健康专业人士学习过HBPM技术的患者组中,具有真正WCE的受试者(53.2%; p = 0.01)的比例高于未接受过WPM的受试者(46.8%)。与真正的WCE组(5.1±4.1年; p = 0.04)相比,SOBP组(6.9±4.9年)的HBPM病史更长。 SOBP组(158±13 mmHg)的受试者临床收缩压(SBP)略高于真正的WCE组(154±9 mmHg; p = 0.04)。结论:在这项研究中,大量(> 40%)标记为WCE的患者实际上是血压控制欠佳的患者。因此,应向怀疑患有WCE的患者提供24小时ABPM,以确保为这些患者提供更好的血压控制。我们建议所有高血压患者都应参加HBPM技术课,以准确测量其血压。家用血压测量的历史越长或SBP越高,与WCE相比,患者对BP控制欠佳的可能性就越大。 HBPM患者应由护士对其血压测量技术进行评估,这可能会降低可疑WCE患者血压控制欠佳的比例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号