首页> 外文期刊>Dental Research Journal >Effect of different finishing/polishing procedures on surface roughness of Ormocer?based and different resin composites
【24h】

Effect of different finishing/polishing procedures on surface roughness of Ormocer?based and different resin composites

机译:不同的抛光/抛光程序对基于Ormocer?和不同树脂复合材料的表面粗糙度的影响

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the surface roughness of six esthetic restorative materials (Gradia Direct Anterior, GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan; Filtek Supreme XTE, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA; Ceram.X Universal, Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany; Essentia enamel, GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan; Admira Fusion, Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany; and Estelite, Tokuyama Dental corporation, Taitou?ku, Tokyo, Japan) achieved using three different finishing and polishing techniques. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study Forty specimens of each material (6 mm in diameter, 2 mm high) were created and divided into four groups, one per each finishing and polishing procedure and a control group, only cured and not polished. All specimen preparation and finishing and polishing procedures were performed by the same investigator, to reduce variability, following strictly the manufacturer’s instructions. Specimens were analyzed using a profilometer to measure the mean surface roughness (Ra, μm), and microscopy images were taken during the measurements through the microscope of the profilometer. Two?way ANOVA test was applied to determine significant differences with respect to material, finishing/polishing technique, and interaction between both variables. Post hoc comparison was done using Tukey’s honestly significant difference test. Significance for statistical tests was predetermined at P 0.05. Results: Finishing and polishing procedure using tungsten carbide burs provided the best values in terms of surface roughness. All materials of this study treated with this method have provided superimposable values, and no material can be considered more performing than the others. Similar values were also found in the control group. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the finishing technique with carbide burs produced an excellent surface smoothness, even if the best surface smoothness is achieved curing the restorative material under a polyester matrix.
机译:背景:这项研究的目的是评估和比较六种美学修复材料的表面粗糙度(Gradia Direct Anterior,GC Corporation,日本东京; Filtek Supreme XTE,3M ESPE,St。Paul,MN,美国; Ceram.X)分别使用三种不同的精加工和抛光技术,分别在德国康斯坦茨的Dentsply DeTrey,环球公司,日本东京的GC公司的Essentia搪瓷,德国的Cuxhaven的Voco公司的Admira Fusion和在日本的东京Taitouku的德山牙科公司的Estelite进行了抛光。技术。材料和方法:在这项体外研究中,每种材料制作了40个样品(直径6毫米,高2毫米),分为四组,每个精加工和抛光程序一个,对照组,仅固化而不抛光。严格按照制造商的指示,所有样品的制备,精加工和抛光程序均由同一研究人员执行,以减少变化。使用轮廓仪对样品进行分析以测量平均表面粗糙度(Ra,μm),并且在测量过程中通过轮廓仪的显微镜拍摄显微图像。应用双向ANOVA测试确定材料,精加工/抛光技术以及两个变量之间的相互作用方面的显着差异。事后比较是使用Tukey的诚实重大差异测试进行的。统计检验的显着性预先确定为P <0.05。结果:就表面粗糙度而言,使用碳化钨磨头的抛光和抛光程序提供了最佳值。使用该方法处理的本研究的所有材料均提供了可叠加的值,没有任何一种材料比其他材料具有更好的性能。在对照组中也发现了相似的值。结论:这项研究表明,即使在聚酯基体下固化修复材料达到了最佳表面光滑度,硬质合金磨头的精加工技术也能产生出色的表面光滑度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号