...
首页> 外文期刊>Dental Research Journal >Effect of Er:YAG laser cavity preparation on the bond strength of 2?hydroxyethyl methacrylate?free and 2?hydroxyethyl methacrylate?rich self?etch adhesive systems: An in vitro study
【24h】

Effect of Er:YAG laser cavity preparation on the bond strength of 2?hydroxyethyl methacrylate?free and 2?hydroxyethyl methacrylate?rich self?etch adhesive systems: An in vitro study

机译:Er:YAG激光腔制备对无2?甲基丙烯酸羟乙酯和富含2?甲基丙烯酸羟乙酯的自蚀刻胶粘体系粘结强度的影响:体外研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Despite many advantages of lasers and reduction of the risk of surface bonding errors with newer self?etch systems, they have not been thoroughly researched. This study was done to evaluate the effect of Er:YAG laser cavity preparation on the microtensile bond strength of 2?hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA)?rich and HEMA?free one?step self?etch adhesive systems. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, eighty freshly extracted human premolars were collected. Cavities were prepared in 40 teeth with carbide bur (Group 1) and in other 40 teeth with Er:YAG LASER (490 mJ and 15 Hz) (Group 2). Subgroups of twenty teeth each were made according to the adhesive systems used. After placement of restoration, the mean values of the bond strength were calculated using universal testing machine. Data were then tabulated and analyzed using descriptive statistics (Significant at P 0.05). Results: The overall microtensile bonding strength was higher when the cavities were prepared with bur compared to those with Er:YAG laser. Mean bond strengths of single?bottle self?etching seventh?generation dentin bonding agents to bur?prepared cavities were higher than those to laser?prepared cavities irrespective of the adhesive system (P = 0.01). No statistically significant difference was observed between HEMA?free and HEMA?rich self?etch adhesive systems. Conclusion: The effect of Er:YAG laser for cavity preparation did not show improved performance when evaluated using microtensile bond strength with seventh?generation bonding agents, Adper Easy One and G?Bond. More studies are required to assess the effect of lasers.
机译:背景:尽管使用激光具有许多优势,并且可以使用新型自蚀刻系统降低表面键合错误的风险,但尚未对其进行深入研究。进行这项研究是为了评估Er:YAG激光腔体制备对富2α甲基丙烯酸羟乙酯(HEMA)和不含HEMA的一步自腐蚀胶粘剂体系的微拉伸粘合强度的影响。材料和方法:在这项体外研究中,收集了80个新鲜提取的人类前磨牙。用硬质合金车针(第1组)在40个牙齿中准备腔,用Er:YAG LASER(490 mJ和15 Hz)(第2组)在其他40个牙齿中准备腔。每个二十个牙齿的亚组是根据所使用的粘合剂系统制成的。放置修复体后,使用万能试验机计算粘结强度的平均值。然后使用描述性统计数据将数据制成表格并进行分析(在P <0.05时显着)。结果:与用Er:YAG激光相比,用bur制备的腔体的整体微拉伸粘结强度更高。单瓶自浸第七代牙本质粘合剂与bur制备的腔体的平均粘结强度高于激光制备的腔体,与胶粘剂体系无关(P = 0.01)。无HEMA和富HEMA的自蚀刻胶粘剂系统之间没有统计学上的显着差异。结论:用微拉伸粘合强度与第七代粘合剂Adper Easy One和G?Bond评估时,Er:YAG激光在腔制备中的效果未显示出改善的性能。需要更多的研究来评估激光的效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号