首页> 外文期刊>Decision Science Letters >Comparing fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS for evaluation of business intelligence vendors
【24h】

Comparing fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS for evaluation of business intelligence vendors

机译:比较模糊AHP和模糊TOPSIS以评估商业智能供应商

获取原文
       

摘要

The main objective of this study is to identify the most important criteria and indicators in selection of business intelligence vendors, and ranking the vendors of such tools using Fuzzy Analytical hierarchy Process (FAHP) and Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (FTOPSIS), to compare results of these two methods and to provide appropriate solutions for the sample company, namely National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC).Spearman & apos; s rank correlation test was used for comparing the methods and determining their correlation. A strong positive correlation was observed between the ranks of business intelligence tools at the significance level of 0.05 in both methods. The results of the ranking by means of FAHP method show that IBM Company was the best one, followed by Oracle, SAS, QlikTech, SAP and Microsoft. However, based on the FTOPSIS method, Oracle was the leading company, followed by IBM, SAS and SAP and finally Microsoft.
机译:这项研究的主要目的是确定选择商业智能供应商时最重要的标准和指标,并使用模糊分析层次过程(FAHP)和模糊技术通过类似于理想解决方案的订单偏好(FTOPSIS)对此类工具的供应商进行排名),以比较这两种方法的结果并为样本公司(即伊朗国家石油公司(NIOC))提供适当的解决方案。的秩相关检验用于比较方法和确定其相关性。在这两种方法中,在0.05的显着性水平上,商业智能工具等级之间均存在强正相关。通过FAHP方法进行的排名结果表明,IBM公司是最好的公司,其次是Oracle,SAS,QlikTech,SAP和Microsoft。但是,基于FTOPSIS方法,Oracle是领先的公司,其次是IBM,SAS和SAP,最后是Microsoft。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号