...
首页> 外文期刊>Danishgah-i Ulum-i Pizishki va Khadamat-i Bihdashti-Darmani Shahid Sadugi Yazd. Majallah >Comparison of the Effect of Canal Preparation by Step Back Technique Using Hand Instruments and Gates Glidden Drills with ProTaper Universal Rotary System on the Root Resistance to Vertical Fracture
【24h】

Comparison of the Effect of Canal Preparation by Step Back Technique Using Hand Instruments and Gates Glidden Drills with ProTaper Universal Rotary System on the Root Resistance to Vertical Fracture

机译:比较使用ProTaper万能旋转系统通过手动工具和盖茨滑行式钻头通过后退技术进行根管预备对根管垂直骨折的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Cleaning and shaping of the root canal system with an efficient and safe technique are the major goals of root canal treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the conventional root canal preparation technique by hand instruments and Gates Glidden drills with ProTaper Universal Rotary system on the root susceptibility to vertical fracture.Methods: Thirty extracted human mandibular premolars were randomly assigned to two groups. In group I, apical preparation was performed with k-files up to #40 utilizing step back technique and coronal flaring was done with Gates Glidden drills. In group II, ProTaper Universal Rotary instruments were used up to the file F4. All teeth were obturated with lateral compaction technique using gutta-percha and AH26 sealer. A simulated periodontal ligament was fabricated, and the teeth were mounted. A stainless steel finger spreader #35 was mounted in an Instron testing machine and the necessary load to cause a root fracture was inserted and recorded. The obtained data were analyzed statistically using T-test.Results: The force required to fracture was significantly lower for the roots prepared by ProTaper instruments in comparison with the specimens prepared by hand instruments and Gates Glidden drills (P< 0.001).Conclusion: Canal preparation with ProTaper rotary instruments can make the roots more susceptible to vertical fracture than traditional instrumentation with k-files and Gates Glidden drills.
机译:简介:用高效安全的技术清洁和塑造根管系统是根管治疗的主要目标。这项研究的目的是比较传统的手动根管准备技术和ProTaper Universal Rotary系统在Gates Glidden钻头上对垂直骨折的易感性。方法:将30例提取的人类下颌前磨牙随机分为两组。在第一组中,使用后退技术用k锉直至#40进行根尖准备,并用盖茨格利登钻头进行冠状扩口。在第二组中,ProTaper通用旋转仪器一直使用到文件F4。所有牙均使用gutta-percha和AH26封闭剂通过侧向压实技术进行封闭。制作了模拟的牙周膜,并安装了牙齿。将不锈钢手指撒布机#35安装在Instron测试机中,插入并记录导致牙根骨折的必要载荷。使用T检验对获得的数据进行统计分析。结果:与手动器械和盖茨格利登钻头制备的标本相比,ProTaper器械制备的根部断裂所需的力明显更低(P <0.001)。与使用k锉刀和Gates Glidden钻头的传统器械相比,使用ProTaper旋转器械进行的根准备可以使根更容易受到垂直裂缝的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号