...
首页> 外文期刊>HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies >Die swyggebod van 1 Korintiers 14:34-35 weer eens onder die loep
【24h】

Die swyggebod van 1 Korintiers 14:34-35 weer eens onder die loep

机译:哥林多前书14:34-35的沉默诫命再次受到审查

获取原文
           

摘要

The taceat mulier of 1 Cor 14:34-35 revisited. Discussions of the role of women in the church's ministry, as well as feminist?attacks on Paul, require that the debate on 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 should continue. The latest attempt to solve the clash between 1 Corinthians 11:2-16 and?14:34-35 by text-critical means is discussed and various harmonizing efforts are?criticized. Also the expedient of putting the taceat in the mouth of an opposing?party is found unconvincing. Paul's theology and especially his view of women in?the ministry, indicate that 1 Corinthians 14:33b-36 should be viewed as a post-Pauline interpolation. The development of the different textual traditions was?quite complex and includes various kinds of redactional activity. Ironical as it?may seem, the identification of 1 Corinthians 33b-36 as a post-Pauline insertion?brings us nearer to the original Pauline text than mere external text-critical?considerations. However, the always imminent danger of subjectivity requires that?this procedure be applied with great circumspection and only as a last option.
机译:重新访问了1 Cor 14:34-35的taceat mulier。讨论妇女在教会事工中的角色以及女权主义者对保罗的袭击,要求继续关于哥林多前书14:34-35的辩论。讨论了通过文本批判的方法来解决哥林多前书11:2-16和14:34-35之间冲突的最新尝试,并对各种协调努力进行了批评。同样也发现,在对手方的嘴里放上开枪的权宜之计令人信服。保罗的神学,尤其是他对部中妇女的观点,表明哥林多前书14:33b-36应该被视为保琳时代后的插补。不同文本传统的发展是相当复杂的,包括各种编辑活动。似乎具有讽刺意味的是,将1科林斯人33b-36识别为Pauline后的插入词,使我们更接近原始Pauline文本,而不是单纯的外部文本批评性考虑。然而,主观性总是迫在眉睫的危险,要求此程序必须谨慎使用,并且只能作为最后的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号