首页> 外文期刊>Human Movement >Physical Effort, Energy Expenditure, and Motivation in Structured and Unstructured Active Video Games: A Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

Physical Effort, Energy Expenditure, and Motivation in Structured and Unstructured Active Video Games: A Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:结构化和非结构化主动视频游戏中的体力,能量消耗和动机:随机对照试验

获取原文
       

摘要

Purpose. The goals of the study were: a) to compare the way that two types of active video games (AVG) influenced physical effort and motivation in young adults; b) to compare direct and indirect instruments and use an indirect instrument (heart rate analysis) as a practical tool to verify physical effort in AVGs.Methods. Initially, 16 healthy but physically inactive young adult males with no AVGs experience took part in the randomized control trial. After the baseline assessments of blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and aerobic capacity (AE), the participants were randomized into two groups: structured AVG (n = 6) and unstructured AVG (n = 7) (3 dropouts). They played 3 sessions a week, during 6 weeks. Direct and indirect metabolic measurements were made. To compare direct and indirect AE, Student t-test was used for related samples. Changes (group × time) in HR, perceived exertion (PE), calculated energy expenditure (EE), calculated metabolic equivalent (MET), and motivation (points) were assessed with the two-way analysis of variance.Results. There were no differences between direct and indirect AE (36.0 ± 5.2 vs 33.9 ± 6.0 ml/kg/min: unstructured; 39.0 ± 5.9 vs 37.7 ± 5.9 ml/kg/min; p > 0.05). No differences were observed in maximal HR, PE, or motivation (p > 0.05). Statistically significant differences referred to average HR, MET, and EE over the sessions (p Conclusions. HR and EE responses of structured AVGs turned out higher than those of unstructured AVGs, and the measurements proved efficient to analyse physical effort in AVGs in a long-term perspective.
机译:目的。该研究的目的是:a)比较两种类型的主动视频游戏(AVG)影响年轻人的体力和动力的方式; b)比较直接仪器和间接仪器,并使用间接仪器(心率分析)作为验证AVG中体力劳动的实用工具。最初,有16名健康但身体不活跃的没有AVG经验的成年男性参加了随机对照试验。在对血压(BP),心率(HR)和有氧运动能力(AE)进行基线评估之后,将参与者随机分为两组:结构化AVG(n = 6)和非结构化AVG(n = 7)(3个辍学者) )。他们在6周内每周进行3次训练。进行直接和间接代谢测量。为了比较直接和间接AE,将Student t检验用于相关样本。通过方差的双向分析评估了HR,感知的劳累(PE),计算的能量消耗(EE),计算的代谢当量(MET)和动机(点)的变化(组×时间)。直接和间接AE之间没有差异(36.0±5.2 vs 33.9±6.0 ml / kg / min:非结构化; 39.0±5.9 vs 37.7±5.9 ml / kg / min; p> 0.05)。在最大的HR,PE或动机方面未观察到差异(p> 0.05)。统计上的显着差异指的是会议期间的平均HR,MET和EE(p结论。结构化AVG的HR和EE响应比非结构化AVG的响应要高,并且测量结果被证明可有效分析AVG的长期体力劳动。学期观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号