首页> 外文期刊>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences >The benefits of spatial resolution increase in global simulations of the hydrological cycle evaluated for the Rhine and Mississippi basins
【24h】

The benefits of spatial resolution increase in global simulations of the hydrological cycle evaluated for the Rhine and Mississippi basins

机译:在对莱茵河和密西西比河流域进行的水文循环全球模拟中,提高空间分辨率的好处

获取原文
           

摘要

To study the global hydrological cycle and its response to a changing climate, we rely on global climate models?(GCMs) and global hydrological models?(GHMs). The spatial resolution of these models is restricted by computational resources and therefore limits the processes and level of detail that can be resolved. Increase in computer power therefore permits increase in resolution, but it is an open question where this resolution is invested best: in the GCM or GHM. In this study, we evaluated the benefits of increased resolution, without modifying the representation of physical processes in the models. By doing so, we can evaluate the benefits of resolution alone. We assess and compare the benefits of an increased resolution for a GCM and a GHM for two basins with long observational records: the Rhine and Mississippi basins. Increasing the resolution of a GCM (1.125?to 0.25) results in an improved precipitation budget over the Rhine basin, attributed to a more realistic large-scale circulation. These improvements with increased resolution are not found for the Mississippi basin, possibly because precipitation is strongly dependent on the representation of still unresolved convective processes. Increasing the resolution of the GCM improved the simulations of the monthly-averaged discharge for the Rhine, but did not improve the representation of extreme streamflow events. For the Mississippi basin, no substantial differences in precipitation and discharge were found with the higher-resolution GCM and GHM. Increasing the resolution of parameters describing vegetation and orography in the high-resolution GHM (from 0.5?to 0.05) shows no significant differences in discharge for both basins. A straightforward resolution increase in the GHM is thus most likely not the best method to improve discharge predictions, which emphasizes the need for better representation of processes and improved parameterizations that go hand in hand with resolution increase in a GHM.
机译:为了研究全球水文循环及其对气候变化的响应,我们依靠全球气候模型(GCMs)和全球水文模型(GHMs)。这些模型的空间分辨率受到计算资源的限制,因此限制了可以解决的过程和详细程度。因此,计算机能力的提高可以提高分辨率,但是,最好在GCM或GHM中投资此分辨率是一个悬而未决的问题。在这项研究中,我们评估了提高分辨率的好处,而没有修改模型中物理过程的表示。这样,我们可以单独评估分辨率的好处。我们评估并比较了具有长观测记录的两个盆地(莱茵河和密西西比盆地)增加的GCM和GHM分辨率的好处。将GCM的分辨率提高(1.125?至0.25),可以使莱茵河流域的降水预算得到改善,这归因于更现实的大规模环流。对于密西西比盆地,未发现这些分辨率提高的改善,这可能是因为降水强烈依赖于尚未解决的对流过程。 GCM分辨率的提高改善了莱茵河每月平均流量的模拟,但并未改善极端水流事件的表示。对于密西西比盆地,高分辨率GCM和GHM的降水量和流量没有实质性差异。在高分辨率GHM中将描述植被和地形的参数的分辨率提高(从0.5?到0.05),表明两个盆地的流量均无显着差异。因此,在GHM中直接提高分辨率很可能不是改善放电预测的最佳方法,这强调了更好地表示过程以及与GHM分辨率提高紧密相关的改进参数化的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号