首页> 外文期刊>Hyle: International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry >William R. Newman: Promethean Ambitions: Alchemy and the Quest to Perfect Nature
【24h】

William R. Newman: Promethean Ambitions: Alchemy and the Quest to Perfect Nature

机译:威廉·纽曼(William R.Newman):普罗米修斯的野心:炼金术与追求自然的追求

获取原文
           

摘要

Referring to the Whig Party, the former political opponents of the Tories in Great Britain, British historian Herbert Butterfield once coined the term 'Whig-gish' historiography for any account that looks at the past from the perspec-tive of the present, as if the goal of the past were the achievement of the pre-sent. Thus, a 'Whiggish' history of sci-ence carefully ignores everything of the past that does not suit the idea of a steady growth of science towards the current state. Strangely enough, that ap-proach has been prominent in philoso-phy too, from Hegel to recent philoso-phy science, so that we could equally speak of 'Hegelian historiography'. Because alchemy was driven by the belief in the transmutation of our ele-ments, it does not go well with the Whiggish historiography (and philoso-phy) of science. In this view, the labora-tory work of the alchemists was neither experimental, because they did not measure anything unlike their contem-porary astronomers, nor scientific, be-cause they were not seeking for mathe-matical theories unlike math teachers such as Galilei, nor technological, be-cause they were unsuccessful quacks and impostors. So, you better forget about this wrong track in the otherwise glori-ous history of science, even if the track lasted for almost two thousand years. At best, their unscientific, cryptic, and contradictory attitudes might qualify al-chemists as bedfellows of the fine arts, as an inspirational source for mystic, an-ti-scientific movements. Modern sci-ence, on the other hand, as epitomized, for instance, by the latest nanotechnol-ogy, is now on the brink of making the illusionary dreams of the alchemists be-come real: wealth, longevity, and even the laboratory creation of life. While such a view flatters and satisfies the modern ego, it does everything to mis-understand science and its role in socie-ty and lets the propagators of science and technology run again and again into the same old societal troubles
机译:关于辉格党,辉格党是英国保守党的前政治反对派,英国历史学家赫伯特·巴特菲尔德(Herbert Butterfield)曾为“辉格纪”史学创造了术语,意为从现在的角度看过去过去的目标是实现目标。因此,科学的“ whiggish”历史仔细地忽略了过去的一切,不适合科学朝着当前状态稳定发展的想法。奇怪的是,从黑格尔到最近的哲学科学,这种方法在哲学领域也很突出,因此我们可以同等地谈论“黑格尔历史学”。因为炼金术是由对我们元素的trans变的信念驱动的,所以它与科学的辉格史学(和哲学史)并不相称。按照这种观点,炼金术士的实验室工作既不是实验性的,因为他们没有像他们的当代天文学家那样测量任何东西,也不是科学的,因为他们不是在寻求像伽利略这样的数学老师那样的数学理论,也不是技术性的,因为它们不是成功的庸医和冒名顶替者。因此,即使这条持续了将近2000年的历史,您也最好忘记这条错误的科学发展史中的错误轨迹。充其量,他们不科学,神秘和矛盾的态度可能使化学家成为美术的同床异动者,成为神秘,反科学运动的灵感来源。另一方面,例如,以最新的纳米技术为代表的现代科学,现在正处于使炼金术师的幻象梦想成为现实的边缘:财富,寿命,甚至实验室的建立生活。这种观点虽然恭维和满足了现代自我,但它所做的一切都是误解科学及其在社会中的作用,并使科学技术的传播者一次又一次地陷入同样的​​旧社会困境中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号