首页> 外文期刊>Trends in Hearing >Comparing Rapid and Traditional Forward-Masked Spatial Tuning Curves in Cochlear-Implant Users
【24h】

Comparing Rapid and Traditional Forward-Masked Spatial Tuning Curves in Cochlear-Implant Users

机译:比较人工耳蜗用户的传统快速和传统掩膜空间调谐曲线

获取原文
       

摘要

A rapid forward-masked spatial tuning curve measurement procedure, based on Bekesy tracking, was adapted and evaluated for use with cochlear implants. Twelve postlingually-deafened adult cochlear-implant users participated. Spatial tuning curves using the new procedure and using a traditional forced-choice adaptive procedure resulted in similar estimates of parameters. The Bekesy-tracking method was almost 3 times faster than the forced-choice procedure, but its test–retest reliability was significantly poorer. Although too time-consuming for general clinical use, the new method may have some benefits in individual cases, where identifying electrodes with poor spatial selectivity as candidates for deactivation is deemed necessary.
机译:基于Bekesy跟踪的快速向前掩蔽的空间调谐曲线测量过程进行了调整,并进行了评估,以用于人工耳蜗。十二名耳聋的成年人工耳蜗使用者参加了比赛。使用新程序并使用传统的强制选择自适应程序进行空间调整曲线会得出相似的参数估计值。 Bekesy跟踪方法几乎比强制选择方法快3倍,但其重测信度却明显较差。尽管对于一般临床使用而言太耗时,但是该新方法在个别情况下可能具有一些好处,在这种情况下,认为必须将空间选择性较差的电极识别为停用电极。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号