首页> 外文期刊>Trends in Hearing >Association Between Subjective Tinnitus and Cervical Spine or Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review
【24h】

Association Between Subjective Tinnitus and Cervical Spine or Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review

机译:主观耳鸣和颈椎或颞下颌关节疾病之间的关联:系统的审查。

获取原文
       

摘要

Movements of the neck and jaw may modulate the loudness and pitch of tinnitus. The aim of the present study was to systematically analyze the strength of associations between subjective tinnitus, cervical spine disorders (CSD), and temporomandibular disorders (TMD). A systematic literature search of the Medline, Embase, and Pedro databases was carried out on articles published up to September 2017. This covered studies in which tinnitus and CSD or TMD were studied as a primary or a secondary outcome and in which outcomes were compared with a control group. Included articles were evaluated on nine methodological quality criteria. Associations between tinnitus and CSD or TMD were expressed as odds ratios. In total, 2,139 articles were identified, of which 24 studies met the inclusion criteria. Twice, two studies were based on the same data set; consequently, 22 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Methodological quality was generally limited by a lack of blinding, comparability of groups, and nonvalidated instruments for assessing CSD. Results indicated that patients with tinnitus more frequently reported CSD than subjects without tinnitus. The odds ratio was 2.6 (95% CI [1.1, 6.4]). For TMD, a bidirectional association with tinnitus was found; odds ratios ranged from 2.3 (95%CI [1.5, 3.6]) for arthrogenous TMD to 6.7 (95%CI [2.4, 18.8]) for unspecified TMD. Funnel plots suggested a publication bias. After adjusting for this, the odds ratios decreased, but associations persisted. There is weak evidence for an association between subjective tinnitus and CSD and a bidirectional association between tinnitus and TMD.
机译:脖子和下巴的运动可能会调节耳鸣的响度和音调。本研究的目的是系统地分析主观耳鸣,颈椎疾病(CSD)和颞下颌疾病(TMD)之间的关联的强度。对截至2017年9月发表的文章进行了Medline,Embase和Pedro数据库的系统文献检索。该研究涵盖了耳鸣和CSD或TMD作为主要或次要结果进行了研究,并对结果进行了比较。对照组。纳入的文章根据九种方法学质量标准进行了评估。耳鸣与CSD或TMD之间的关联以比值比表示。总共确定了2139篇文章,其中24篇研究符合纳入标准。两次,两项研究基于相同的数据集;因此,荟萃分析包括22项研究。由于缺乏盲目性,各组之间的可比性以及用于评估CSD的未经验证的工具,方法学质量通常受到限制。结果表明,耳鸣患者比无耳鸣患者更经常报告CSD。优势比为2.6(95%CI [1.1,6.4])。对于TMD,发现了与耳鸣的双向关联。关节炎TMD的优势比范围从2.3(95%CI [1.5,3.6])到未指定TMD的6.7(95%CI [2.4,18.8])。漏斗图表明出版偏见。对此进行调整后,优势比降低,但关联仍然存在。关于主观耳鸣与CSD之间的关联以及耳鸣与TMD之间的双向关联的证据很少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号