【24h】

Stented bioprostheses in aortic position

机译:支架生物假体位于主动脉位置

获取原文
       

摘要

For the invasive treatment of symptomatic aortic stenosis several attractive options became available beyond conventional cardiosurgical implantation of stented bioprostheses or mechanical valves. Besides stentless prostheses, in particular transcatheter procedures are of growing importance. Nevertheless the number of implanted stented bioprostheses in Germany expanded or at least remained stable over the last years. Thus, 9.704 bioprostheses were implanted in Germany in 2010, according to 84% of all implanted prostheses in aortic position [1]. This proportion has dramatically switched in favor of bioprostheses during the last 15 years. Implantation of bioprostheses was associated with a 30-day-mortality of 3,3 %, which is higher than for mechanical valves (1,5%) due to the fact that patients for bioprostheses are significantly older or suffer from more complex co-morbidities [2]. The purpose of this review is to summarize the features of the currently available bioprostheses in the light of competing procedures.
机译:对于有症状的主动脉瓣狭窄的侵入性治疗,除了带支架的生物假体或机械瓣膜的常规心脏外科手术植入以外,还有许多有吸引力的选择。除了无支架假体,尤其是经导管手术的重要性也越来越高。然而,在过去的几年中,德国植入式支架生物假体的数量有所增加,或至少保持稳定。因此,根据在主动脉位置植入的所有假体的84%,2010年在德国植入了9.704个生物假体[1]。在过去的15年中,这一比例已显着转向支持生物假体。植入生物假体的30天死亡率为3.3%,高于机械瓣膜的死亡率(1.5%),原因是生物假体患者年龄较大或患有更复杂的合并症[2]。这篇综述的目的是根据竞争程序总结当前可用的生物假体的特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号