首页> 外文期刊>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences >Identification and regionalization of dominant runoff processes – a GIS-based and a statistical approach
【24h】

Identification and regionalization of dominant runoff processes – a GIS-based and a statistical approach

机译:确定和划分主要径流过程–基于GIS的统计方法

获取原文
           

摘要

In this study two approaches are presented to identify Dominant RunoffProcesses (DRP) with respect to regionalization. The approaches are asimplification of an existing method to determine DRP by means of anextensive field campaign. The first approach combines the permeability ofthe substratum, land-use and slope of the basin in a GIS-based analysis. Thesecond approach makes use of discriminant analysis of the physiographiccharacteristics of the basin and links it to the GIS analysis. The resultsof the developed approaches are maps, which identify dominant runoffprocesses and represent a spatial distribution of the hydrological behaviourof the soil during prolonged rainfall events. The approaches have beendeveloped in a micro-scale basin (Germany). An additional meso-scale basinwas introduced in which the two approaches were applied for quality control.The thus generated maps for the micro-scale basin were compared with anexisting DRP map, which was derived with the existing method. The firstapproach showed a resemblance of 79% when compared to this map, whereasthe second approach showed only a resemblance of 51%. The generated mapsfor the meso-scale basin were compared to DRP that were determined pointwise according to the existing method. The first approach showed in thiscase a resemblance of 81%, whereas the second approach showed aresemblance of 68%. Therefore, the first approach is preferred to thesecond approach when accuracy, data input and calculation time areconcerned.
机译:在这项研究中,提出了两种方法来确定区域化过程中的主要径流过程(DRP)。这些方法是通过广泛的野外活动确定DRP的现有方法的简化。第一种方法在基于GIS的分析中结合了地下渗透率,土地利用和盆地坡度。第二种方法是利用判别式分析盆地的地貌特征,并将其与GIS分析联系起来。所开发方法的结果是地图,这些地图确定了主要的径流过程,并代表了长时间降雨事件期间土壤水文行为的空间分布。该方法已在微型盆地(德国)中开发。引入了另外一种中尺度盆地,其中将两种方法都应用到了质量控制中。将由此生成的微尺度盆地图与现有DRP图进行比较,现有DRP图是使用现有方法得出的。与该图相比,第一种方法显示相似度为79%,而第二种方法仅显示相似度为51%。将生成的中尺度盆地图与DRP进行比较,DRP是根据现有方法逐点确定的。在这种情况下,第一种方法显示相似度为81%,而第二种方法显示相似度为68%。因此,在考虑准确性,数据输入和计算时间时,第一种方法要优于第二种方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号