...
首页> 外文期刊>Humanities >The Art of Democracy—Art as a Tool for Developing Democratic Citizenship and Stimulating Public Debate: A Rortyan-Deweyan Account
【24h】

The Art of Democracy—Art as a Tool for Developing Democratic Citizenship and Stimulating Public Debate: A Rortyan-Deweyan Account

机译:民主的艺术-作为发展民主公民和刺激公共辩论的工具的艺术:Rortyan-Deweyan的叙述

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Richard Rorty holds that the novel is the characteristic genre of democracy, because it helps people to develop and to stabilize two crucial capabilities the ideal inhabitants of democratic societies should possess: a keen sense for anti-foundationalism and a disposition for solidarity. He believes that novels help develop these capabilities by educating our capacity for criticism and our capacity for attentive-empathetic perception. This article argues in favor of this Rortyan idea, showing how anti-foundationalism and solidarity can be seen as important instances of what I will call 'dispositions for democratic citizenship' and that art (and not only novels) and its reception, are valuable tools for advancing these dispositions. However, as the Rortyan public-private dichotomy assigns art’s function of criticism only to the private sphere, Rorty ignores its potential for stimulating democratic public deliberation and he misses the fact that art’s functions of criticism and of attentive-empathetic perception partially depend on each other if they are effectively to lead to increased solidarity and change social realities. Thus this article argues—taking these objections into account—to slightly modify, but nevertheless value Rorty’s idea that art and its reception are crucial resources for democratic citizenship and for the process of democratic deliberation.
机译:理查德·罗蒂(Richard Rorty)认为,小说是民主的特色流派,因为它可以帮助人们发展和稳定民主社会理想居民应具备的两项关键能力:敏锐的反基础主义意识和团结精神。他认为,小说通过教育我们的批评能力和我们的注意移情能力来帮助发展这些能力。本文主张采用Rortyan的想法,表明如何将反基础主义和团结视为我称之为“民主公民倾向”的重要实例,并且艺术(不仅是小说)及其接受是有价值的工具推进这些安排。然而,由于罗蒂扬公私二分法仅将艺术的批评功能分配给私人领域,罗蒂忽略了其刺激民主公共协商的潜力,他怀念这样一个事实,即艺术的批评功能和关注移情的感知部分相互依赖它们是否有效地导致了团结的增加和社会现实的改变。因此,本文认为-考虑到这些反对意见-进行了些微修改,但仍然珍视罗蒂的思想,即艺术及其接受是民主公民和民主审议过程的关键资源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号