首页> 外文学位 >Democratic debates in land use planning and decision-making: A case study of public participation in Wisconsin.
【24h】

Democratic debates in land use planning and decision-making: A case study of public participation in Wisconsin.

机译:土地使用规划和决策中的民主辩论:威斯康星州公众参与的案例研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This thesis explores the use of public participation in land use planning and decision-making as a potential way to alleviate and/or avoid the conflicts that have hindered efforts to protect environmental resources in this country. It draws on an interdisciplinary theoretical literature in order to understand the issues at hand. Despite centuries of debate in democratic theory about the use of public participation, fundamental questions remain open to discussion. Although other bodies of literature, such as dispute resolution and procedural justice, help to provide a more comprehensive picture of public participation, they also reveal additional questions. This research addresses some of these uncertainties, including questions of who participates and why, how communication in participatory planning takes place, and what are the outcomes of participation.;Using a comparative case study approach, I examine a recent initiative by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to include local communities in developing a plan for protecting both state lands and productive farms. This initiative took place in two pilot areas in two different parts of the state. From DNR's perspective, the success of the proposal hinged entirely on consensual acceptance at the local level. While the agency ultimately decided that there was insufficient local support to proceed with its plan, the process itself revealed important insights into public participation.;The conclusions drawn from this research emphasize the importance of context in understanding and coordinating public participation efforts and in anticipating their likelihood of success. Factors such as the history of an agency's activities in an area and the level of trust people in the area have in that agency prove to be extremely influential in the way participatory processes unfold. Other key factors include the degree of controversy concerning the proposal is question and the extent to which people in an area are accustomed to and prepared for participating in a planning and decision-making process. Future efforts to include public participation in planning and decision-making should consider these contextual factors in order to design more effective processes. To this end, a template that incorporates these factors is presented.
机译:本文探讨了将公众参与土地利用规划和决策作为缓解和/或避免冲突的潜在途径,这些冲突阻碍了该国保护环境资源的努力。为了了解眼前的问题,它使用了跨学科的理论文献。尽管民主理论中关于使用公众参与的辩论已有数百年之久,但基本问题仍然值得讨论。尽管其他文献机构(例如争端解决和程序正义)有助于提供更全面的公众参与情况,但它们也揭示了其他问题。这项研究解决了这些不确定性中的一些不确定性,包括谁参与,为什么参与,参与式计划中的沟通如何发生以及参与的结果如何等问题;使用比较案例研究方法,我考察了威斯康星州能源与环境部的一项新举措。自然资源(DNR)包括地方社区,以制定保护国有土地和生产性农场的计划。该计划在该州两个不同地区的两个试点地区进行。从DNR的角度来看,该提案的成功完全取决于地方层面的共识。虽然该机构最终认为没有足够的当地支持来执行其计划,但该流程本身揭示了公众参与的重要见解。这项研究得出的结论强调了背景对于理解和协调公众参与工作以及预测其参与的重要性。成功的可能性。诸如某机构在该地区的活动的历史以及该地区对该机构的信任程度之类的因素被证明对参与过程的展开方式具有极大的影响力。其他关键因素包括与提案是否有争议有关的争议程度,以及该地区的人们对参与计划和决策过程的习惯和准备程度。为了使公众参与计划和决策的未来工作,应考虑这些背景因素,以便设计更有效的流程。为此,提出了包含这些因素的模板。

著录项

  • 作者

    Swearingen, Stacey Lynn.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;
  • 学科 Environmental Sciences.;Urban and Regional Planning.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1998
  • 页码 213 p.
  • 总页数 213
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:48:37

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号