首页> 外文期刊>Hong Kong journal of emergency medicine. >Evaluation of the Revised Trauma Score in Predicting Outcomes of Trauma Patients
【24h】

Evaluation of the Revised Trauma Score in Predicting Outcomes of Trauma Patients

机译:修订的创伤评分对创伤患者预后的评估

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The revised trauma score (RTS) was developed more than 20 years ago. Few studies investigated its usefulness in predicting trauma outcomes. This is especially true for the weighted version of RTS (RTS-w). The aim of this study was to test the predicting power of RTS-w for the trauma outcomes including mortality, admission to intensive care unit (ICU), hospital length of stay and ICU length of stay through a comparison with Injury Severity Score (ISS). Descriptive data, variables related to the trauma scores and outcomes were collected. The statistical performance of RTS-w and ISS in predicting the trauma outcomes using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence interval and p value were calculated. The Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-squared statistic was performed to measure its calibration. A total of 3323 patients were enrolled in the study. RTS-w was significantly better than ISS in predicting mortality of trauma patients (AUC: 0.934 vs.0.880, p<0.0001). However, for the other three outcomes, i.e. admission to ICU, hospital length of stay and intensive care unit length of stay, the performance of RTS-w was inferior to ISS. The RTS-w is a better predictor of mortality than ISS. But its ability to predict other trauma outcomes is not as good as ISS. More studies are needed to identify the predictive ability of RTS-w for the outcomes other than mortality. Besides, updating the coefficients of the formula may make RTS-w more accurate.
机译:修订的创伤评分(RTS)是20多年前开发的。很少有研究调查其在预测创伤结果中的作用。对于RTS的加权版本(RTS-w)尤其如此。这项研究的目的是通过与伤害严重度评分(ISS)的比较,测试RTS-w对创伤预后的预测能力,包括死亡率,重症监护病房(ICU),住院时间和ICU住院时间。 。收集描述性数据,与创伤评分和结果相关的变量。计算了RTS-w和ISS使用接收器操作特征(ROC)曲线以及95%置信区间和p值在曲线下的面积(AUC)预测创伤后果的统计性能。执行Hosmer-Lemeshow卡方统计量来测量其校准值。该研究共纳入3323名患者。在预测创伤患者的死亡率方面,RTS-w显着优于ISS(AUC:0.934对0.880,p <0.0001)。但是,对于其他三个结局,即入住ICU,住院时间和重症监护病房的住院时间,RTS-w的表现不如ISS。与ISS相比,RTS-w是更好的死亡率预测指标。但是它预测其他创伤结果的能力不如国际空间站。需要更多的研究来确定RTS-w对除死亡率以外的其他结果的预测能力。此外,更新公式的系数可以使RTS-w更准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号