首页> 外文期刊>Healthcare >How Widely are Supportive and Flexible Food Service Systems and Mealtime Interventions Used for People in Residential Care Facilities? A Comparison of Dementia-Specific and Nonspecific Facilities
【24h】

How Widely are Supportive and Flexible Food Service Systems and Mealtime Interventions Used for People in Residential Care Facilities? A Comparison of Dementia-Specific and Nonspecific Facilities

机译:支持和灵活的食品服务系统和进餐时间在居民护理机构中的使用率有多大?痴呆症特定和非特定病设施的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

While improved mealtime practices can reduce agitation, improve quality of life, and increase food intake for people in aged care, the degree of implementation of these strategies is unknown. This study describes food service practices in residential aged care facilities, focusing on units caring for people with dementia. An online survey was distributed to residential aged care facilities for completion by the food service manager (n = 2057). Of the 204 responses to the survey, 63 (31%) contained a dementia-specific unit. Most facilities used adaptive equipment (90.2%) and commercial oral nutritional supplements (87.3%). A higher proportion of facilities with a dementia-specific service used high-contrast plates (39.7%) than those without (18.4%). The majority of facilities had residents make their choice for the meal more than 24 h prior to the meal (30.9%). Use of high contrast plates (n = 51, 25%) and molds to reform texture-modified meals (n = 41, 20.1%) were used by one-quarter or less of surveyed facilities. There is a relatively low use of environmental and social strategies to promote food intake and wellbeing in residents, with a focus instead on clinical interventions. Research should focus on strategies to support implementation of interventions to improve the mealtime experience for residents.
机译:尽管改善进餐时间做法可以减少躁动,改善生活质量并增加老年护理人员的食物摄入量,但这些策略的实施程度尚不清楚。这项研究描述了住宅养老机构中的饮食服务实践,重点关注照顾痴呆症患者的部门。在线调查已分发给居民老年护理机构,供餐饮服务经理完成(n = 2057)。在204份调查问卷中,有63份(31%)包含痴呆症特定单位。大多数设施使用适应性设备(90.2%)和商业口服营养补充剂(87.3%)。进行痴呆症专项治疗的医疗机构中,使用高对比度印版的比例较高(39.7%),而未使用这种方式的比例更高(18.4%)。大多数设施让居民在用餐前24小时选择用餐(30.9%)。四分之一或更少的调查机构使用高对比度板(n = 51,25%)和模具来改良质地改良的餐食(n = 41,20.1%)。使用相对较少的环境和社会策略来促进居民的食物摄入和福祉,而将重点放在临床干预上。研究应集中在支持干预措施实施的策略上,以改善居民的就餐时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号