首页> 外文期刊>Health expectations: an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy >Assessing decision regret in caregivers of deceased German people with cancer—A psychometric validation of the Decision Regret Scale for Caregivers
【24h】

Assessing decision regret in caregivers of deceased German people with cancer—A psychometric validation of the Decision Regret Scale for Caregivers

机译:在已故的德国癌症患者的护理人员中评估决策后悔—护理后悔决定量表的心理计量学验证

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Decisional regret during or after medical treatments is linked to significant distress. Regret affects not only patients but also caregivers having an active or passive role during decision making. The Decision Regret Scale (DRS) is a self‐report measure for regret in patients after treatment decisions. However, practical and psychometrically robust instruments assessing regret in caregivers are lacking. Objective To develop and validate a caregiver version of the DRS (Decision Regret Scale for Caregivers [DRS‐C]). Design Psychometric validation based on a web survey. Setting and participants 361 caregivers of deceased German people/patients with cancer. Main variables studied Besides structural validity and test‐retest reliability, we evaluated measurement invariance accounting for gender, age and closeness of relationship, and tested hypotheses on convergent/discriminant validity. Results Forty‐five per cent of all caregivers demonstrated decision regret. Confirmatory factor analyses strongly supported the unidimensional structure of the DRS‐C and pointed to strict invariance. The DRS‐C demonstrated very good internal consistency (α ?=?0.83, 95% CI [0.81, 0.86]) and test‐retest reliability (ICC [A,1]?=?0.73, 95% CI [0.59, 0.83]) along with sound convergent/discriminant validity. Concerning responsiveness, DRS‐C scores remained stable over a 12‐week period in 83.3% of all caregivers. Receiver operating characteristic analysis yielded a cut point of 43 for the identification of significant decision regret (AUC?=?0.62, 95% CI [0.56, 0.68]). Discussion and conclusions The lack of a gold standard instrument prevented us from examining the criterion validity and determining a minimally important difference. Nevertheless, the DRS‐C provides valid and reliable information regarding caregiver regret following medical decisions. Above all, it captures a crucial aspect of the treatment experience in caregivers.
机译:背景技术在治疗期间或之后的决定性遗憾与严重困扰有关。遗憾不仅影响患者,而且还会影响在决策过程中发挥积极或消极作用的护理人员。决策后悔量表(DRS)是自我报告的量度,用于治疗决定后患者的后悔。但是,缺乏评估看护者后悔的实用且心理上健壮的工具。目的开发和验证DRS(护理人员决定后悔量表[DRS-C])的护理人员版本。基于网络调查的设计心理计量学验证。背景和参与者361名德国已故癌症患者/患者的护理者。研究的主要变量除了结构效度和重测信度之外,我们还评估了性别,年龄和亲密关系的度量不变性,并检验了收敛/区分效度的假设。结果所有看护者中有百分之四十五表现出决策后悔。验证性因素分析强烈支持DRS-C的一维结构,并指出严格不变性。 DRS‐C表现出非常好的内部一致性(<α> = 0.83,95%CI [0.81,0.86])和重测可靠性(ICC [A,1] = 0.73,95%CI [0.59] ,0.83]),以及声音的收敛性/判别有效性。关于反应性,所有护理人员中的83.3%的DRS-C评分在12周内保持稳定。接收机工作特性分析得出了一个用于确定重大决策遗憾的分界点(AUCα=?0.62,95%CI [0.56,0.68])。讨论和结论缺乏金标准的工具使我们无法检验标准的有效性并确定最小的重要差异。但是,DRS‐C提供有关护理人员后做出医疗决定后悔的有效和可靠信息。最重要的是,它涵盖了护理人员治疗经验的关键方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号