首页> 外文期刊>Health expectations: an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy >Patients’ experiences of consultations with physician associates in primary care in England: A qualitative study
【24h】

Patients’ experiences of consultations with physician associates in primary care in England: A qualitative study

机译:患者与英国初级保健医师进行会诊的经验:一项定性研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Physician associates are new to English general practice and set to expand in numbers. Objective To investigate the patients’ perspective on consulting with physician associates in general practice. Design A qualitative study, using semi‐structured interviews, with thematic analysis. Setting and participants Thirty volunteer patients of 430 who had consulted physician associates for a same‐day appointment and had returned a satisfaction survey, in six general practices employing physician associates in England. Findings Some participants only consulted once with a physician associate and others more frequently. The conditions consulted for ranged from minor illnesses to those requiring immediate hospital admission. Understanding the role of the physician associate varied from ‘certain and correct’ to ‘uncertain’, to ‘certain and incorrect’, where the patient believed the physician associate to be a doctor. Most, but not all, reported positive experiences and outcomes of their consultation, with some choosing to consult the physician. Those with negative experiences described problems when the limits of the role were reached, requiring additional GP consultations or prescription delay. Trust and confidence in the physician associate was derived from trust in the NHS, the general practice and the individual physician associate. Willingness to consult a physician associate was contingent on the patient's assessment of the severity or complexity of the problem and the desire for provider continuity. Conclusion Patients saw physician associates as an appropriate general practitioner substitute. Patients’ experience could inform delivery redesign.
机译:背景医师对英语普通科医师来说是新手,并且数量会不断增加。目的探讨患者在一般实践中向医师咨询的观点。设计使用半结构化访谈和主题分析进行定性研究。设置和参与者30名430名志愿患者,他们在英格兰雇用医师协会的六种常规做法中,咨询了医师助理的当日约会并返回了满意度调查。结果一些参与者仅咨询一次医师助理,而其他参与者则更频繁地咨询。咨询的条件从轻微疾病到需要立即入院的疾病不等。对医师助理的作用的理解从“确定和正确”到“不确定”,再到“确定与不正确”,在这种情况下,患者认为医师助理是医生。大多数(但不是全部)报告了积极的经验和咨询结果,有些选择咨询医生。那些具有负面经验的人描述了在达到角色极限时出现的问题,需要额外的全科医生咨询或处方延迟。对医师助理的信任和信心源自对NHS,一般实践和个别医师助理的信任。咨询医师的意愿取决于患者对问题的严重性或复杂性以及提供者连续性的需求的评估。结论患者认为医师是适当的全科医生替代品。患者的经验可能有助于重新设计分娩。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号