...
首页> 外文期刊>Haematologica >Peripheral blood picture in primary hypocellular refractory anemia and idiopathic acquired aplastic anemia: an additional tool for differential diagnosis | Haematologica
【24h】

Peripheral blood picture in primary hypocellular refractory anemia and idiopathic acquired aplastic anemia: an additional tool for differential diagnosis | Haematologica

机译:原发性亚细胞难治性贫血和特发性再生障碍性再生障碍性贫血的外周血象:鉴别诊断的另一种工具血液学

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Hypoplastic myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are being reported with increasing frequency. Aplastic anemia (AA) needs to be differentiated from hypoplastic MDS particularly primary hypoplastic refractory anemia (PHRA) because of the impact on management and prognosis. This distinction may be morphologically difficult even with careful marrow examination which may provide insufficient material due to extreme hypocellularity. The value of peripheral blood (PB) parameters in making the distinction between AA and PHRA is not well studied. In this work, we attempt to examine peripheral blood findings as an additional tool for differentiating PHRA from acquired idiopathic AA. METHODS: PB findings in ten cases of PHRA, which are selected based on the following: less than 30% cellularity, multilineage dysplasia and/or clonal cytogenetic abnormality, are compared to ten cases of classic AA. The PB is examined for automated parameters, differential white cell count, morphologic changes in red cells, white cells, platelets, and the presence of circulating blasts, megakaryocytic fragments and micromegakaryocytes. RESULTS: AA patients tend to have lower platelet and monocytic counts and higher lymphocytic percentages. The following morphologic findings are seen only in PHRA but not in AA: hypochromic red cells, left shift, circulating blasts, hypersegmentation with long filaments, hypogranular, ring, and pelgeroid neutrophils, Dohle bodies, circulating micromegakaryocytes and megakaryocytic fragments. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that careful examination of peripheral blood may provide sufficient information to allow for the distinction between PHRA and AA early in the course of the disease. Similarly, patients with classic AA who subsequently develop unusual blood findings during routine follow up should be suspected of having a clonal evolution which needs to be confirmed by marrow examination and cytogenetic analysis.
机译:背景与目的:增生性骨髓增生异常综合症(MDS)的报道越来越多。由于再生障碍性贫血(ADS)对治疗和预后的影响,因此需要将其与发育不良的MDS(尤其是原发性发育不良的难治性贫血)区别开来。即使经过仔细的骨髓检查,这种区分在形态上也可能很困难,由于极端的细胞过低性,可能无法提供足够的材料。在区分AA和PHRA时,外周血(PB)参数的值尚未得到很好的研究。在这项工作中,我们尝试检查外周血的发现,作为区分PHRA与获得性特发性AA的另一种工具。方法:根据以下内容选择10例PHRA的PB表现:将少于30%的细胞性,多谱系发育异常和/或克隆的细胞遗传学异常与10例经典AA进行比较。检查PB的自动化参数,白细胞差异计数,红细胞,白细胞,血小板的形态变化以及是否存在循环母细胞,巨核细胞碎片和微巨核细胞。结果:AA患者的血小板和单核细胞计数较低,淋巴细胞百分比较高。以下形态学发现仅在PHRA中可见,而在AA中则未发现:变色红细胞,左移,成环成环,长丝过度分裂,下粒,环和类珠状嗜中性粒细胞,Dohle体,循环的巨核细胞和巨核细胞碎片。结论和结论:我们得出结论,仔细检查外周血可能提供足够的信息,以便在病程早期区分PHRA和AA。同样,患有经典AA的患者随后在常规随访期间出现异常血液发现,应怀疑其具有克隆进化,需要通过骨髓检查和细胞遗传学分析加以证实。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号