首页> 外文期刊>Health expectations: an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy >Clinicians’ concerns about decision support interventions for patients facing breast cancer surgery options: understanding the challenge of implementing shared decision‐making
【24h】

Clinicians’ concerns about decision support interventions for patients facing breast cancer surgery options: understanding the challenge of implementing shared decision‐making

机译:临床医生对面临乳腺癌手术选择的患者的决策支持干预措施的担忧:了解实施共同决策的挑战

获取原文
           

摘要

Background There is interest in interventions that provide support for patients facing challenging decisions, such as the choice between mastectomy and breast conservation surgery for breast cancer. However, it is difficult to implement these interventions. One potential source of resistance is the attitudes of clinicians. Objective To examine specialist breast clinicians’ opinions about the provision of decision support interventions (DesIs) for patients. Methods As part of the development of a web‐based DesI (BresDex), semi‐structured interviews were conducted with specialist clinicians [breast surgeons, breast care nurses (BCNs) and oncologists] from four breast units in a UK region, and speciality national opinion leaders. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using the Framework approach. Results A majority of the 24 clinicians interviewed did not have a working knowledge of DesIs and were ambivalent or sceptical. Many expressed conflicting opinions: they noted the potential benefits, but at the same time expressed reservations about information overlap, overload and about content that they considered inappropriate. Many wanted access to DesIs to be always under clinical supervision. In particular, they were uncertain as regards how DeSIs could be tailored to individual patients’ needs and also accommodate clinical practice variation. BCNs were particularly concerned that DesIs might induce patient anxiety and replace their role. Conclusions The concept of providing interventions to support patients in decision‐making tasks generated concern, defensiveness and scepticism. These attitudes will be a significant barrier. Implementation efforts will need to recognize and address these issues if these interventions are to become embedded in clinical practice.
机译:背景技术感兴趣的干预措施可以为面临挑战的患者提供支持,例如乳腺癌的乳房切除术和乳房保护术之间的选择。但是,很难实施这些干预措施。抗药性的一种潜在来源是临床医生的态度。目的探讨专家乳房临床医生对为患者提供决策支持干预措施(DesIs)的意见。方法作为基于Web的DesI(BresDex)开发的一部分,与来自英国地区四个乳腺部门和全国性专科医师的专业临床医生[乳腺外科医生,乳房护理护士(BCN)和肿瘤学家]进行了半结构化访谈。意见领袖。使用框架方法记录,记录和分析访谈。结果接受采访的24位临床医生中的大多数不了解DesIs,并且模棱两可或持怀疑态度。许多人表达了相互矛盾的观点:他们注意到了潜在的好处,但同时对信息重叠,过载和他们认为不合适的内容表示保留。许多人希望对DesIs的访问始终受到临床监督。特别是,他们不确定如何针对个别患者的需求量身定制DeSI,以及如何适应临床实践的变化。 BCN特别担心DesIs可能引起患者焦虑并替代其作用。结论提供干预措施以支持患者执行决策任务的概念引起了关注,防御和怀疑。这些态度将成为重大障碍。如果要将这些干预措施植入临床实践,则实施工作将需要认识并解决这些问题。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号