首页> 外文期刊>Health Research Policy and Systems >Participatory monitoring and evaluation approaches that influence decision-making: lessons from a maternal and newborn study in Eastern Uganda
【24h】

Participatory monitoring and evaluation approaches that influence decision-making: lessons from a maternal and newborn study in Eastern Uganda

机译:影响决策的参与性监测和评估方法:乌干达东部母婴研究的经验教训

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundThe use of participatory monitoring and evaluation (M&E) approaches is important for guiding local decision-making, promoting the implementation of effective interventions and addressing emerging issues in the course of implementation. In this article, we explore how participatory M&E approaches helped to identify key design and implementation issues and how they influenced stakeholders’ decision-making in eastern Uganda. MethodThe data for this paper is drawn from a retrospective reflection of various M&E approaches used in a maternal and newborn health project that was implemented in three districts in eastern Uganda. The methods included qualitative and quantitative M&E techniques such as key informant interviews, formal surveys and supportive supervision, as well as participatory approaches, notably participatory impact pathway analysis. ResultsAt the design stage, the M&E approaches were useful for identifying key local problems and feasible local solutions and informing the activities that were subsequently implemented. During the implementation phase, the M&E approaches provided evidence that informed decision-making and helped identify emerging issues, such as weak implementation by some village health teams, health facility constraints such as poor use of standard guidelines, lack of placenta disposal pits, inadequate fuel for the ambulance at some facilities, and poor care for low birth weight infants. Sharing this information with key stakeholders prompted them to take appropriate actions. For example, the sub-county leadership constructed placenta disposal pits, the district health officer provided fuel for ambulances, and health workers received refresher training and mentorship on how to care for newborns. ConclusionDiverse sources of information and perspectives can help researchers and decision-makers understand and adapt evidence to contexts for more effective interventions. Supporting districts to have crosscutting, routine information generating and sharing platforms that bring together stakeholders from different sectors is therefore crucial for the successful implementation of complex development interventions.
机译:背景技术参与式监测与评估(M&E)方法的使用对于指导地方决策,促进实施有效干预措施以及解决实施过程中出现的新问题至关重要。在本文中,我们探讨了参与式M&E方法如何帮助确定关键的设计和实施问题,以及它们如何影响乌干达东部利益相关者的决策。方法本文的数据来自对乌干达东部三个地区实施的孕产妇和新生儿保健项目中各种M&E方法的回顾性反思。这些方法包括定性和定量M&E技术,例如关键线人访谈,正式调查和支持性监督,以及参与式方法,尤其是参与式影响路径分析。结果在设计阶段,M&E方法可用于识别关键的局部问题和可行的局部解决方案,并为随后实施的活动提供信息。在实施阶段,监测与评估方法为决策提供了依据,并帮助发现了新出现的问题,例如一些乡村卫生小组的实施不力,卫生设施的局限性,例如标准准则使用不善,缺乏胎盘处置坑,燃料不足等。某些设施的救护车,以及低体重婴儿的护理不善。与主要利益相关者共享此信息促使他们采取适当的行动。例如,分县领导修建了胎盘处置场,地区卫生官员为救护车提供了燃料,卫生工作者接受了有关如何照料新生儿的进修培训和指导。结论多样化的信息来源和观点可以帮助研究人员和决策者理解证据,并根据情况调整证据,以采取更有效的干预措施。因此,支持各地区建立跨部门,常规的信息生成和共享平台,将不同部门的利益相关者聚集在一起,对于成功实施复杂的发展干预措施至关重要。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号