首页> 外文期刊>Head Face Medicine >Novel methodologies and technologies to assess mid-palatal suture maturation: a systematic review
【24h】

Novel methodologies and technologies to assess mid-palatal suture maturation: a systematic review

机译:评估pal中缝成熟度的新方法和技术:系统评价

获取原文
       

摘要

IntroductionA reliable method to assess midpalatal suture maturation to drive clinical decision-making, towards non-surgical or surgical expansion, in adolescent and young adult patients is needed. The objectives were to systematically review and evaluate what is known regarding contemporary methodologies capable of assessing midpalatal suture maturation in humans. MethodsA computerized database search was conducted using Medline, PubMed, Embase and Scopus to search the literature up until October 5, 2016. A supplemental hand search was completed of references from retrieved articles that met the final inclusion criteria. ResultsTwenty-nine abstracts met the initial inclusion criteria. Following assessment of full articles, only five met the final inclusion criteria. The number of subjects involved and quality of studies varied, ranging from an in-vitro study using autopsy material to prospective studies with in vivo human patients. Three types of evaluations were identified: quantitative, semi-quantitative and qualitative evaluations. Four of the five studies utilized computed tomography (CT), while the remaining study utilized non-invasive ultrasonography (US). No methodology was validated against a histological-based reference standard. ConclusionsWeak limited evidence exists to support the newest technologies and proposed methodologies to assess midpalatal suture maturation. Due to the lack of reference standard validation, it is advised that clinicians still use a multitude of diagnostic criteria to subjectively assess palatal suture maturation and drive clinical decision-making.
机译:简介需要一种可靠的方法来评估pal骨中线缝合的成熟度,以推动青少年和成年患者走向非手术或手术扩展的临床决策。目的是系统地审查和评估有关能够评估人类pal骨中线缝合成熟度的现代方法学的知识。方法使用Medline,PubMed,Embase和Scopus进行计算机数据库检索,直到2016年10月5日为止。对补充文献中符合最终纳入标准的文献进行补充手工检索。结果29个摘要符合最初的纳入标准。在对整篇文章进行评估之后,只有五项符合最终纳入标准。涉及的受试者数量和研究质量各不相同,从使用尸检材料进行的体外研究到对体内人类患者的前瞻性研究不等。确定了三种类型的评估:定量评估,半定量评估和定性评估。五项研究中的四项利用计算机断层扫描(CT),而其余研究利用无创超声检查(US)。没有针对基于组织学的参考标准对方法进行验证。结论仅有有限的证据支持最新技术和提议的方法来评估pal中缝线成熟度。由于缺乏参考标准验证,建议临床医生仍使用多种诊断标准来主观评估pa缝的成熟度并推动临床决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号