...
首页> 外文期刊>Haematologica >The prognostic value of multiparameter flow cytometry minimal residual disease assessment in relapsed multiple myeloma | Haematologica
【24h】

The prognostic value of multiparameter flow cytometry minimal residual disease assessment in relapsed multiple myeloma | Haematologica

机译:多参数流式细胞术最小残留病评估对复发性多发性骨髓瘤的预后价值血液学

获取原文
           

摘要

Achieving deep levels of remission is one of the prerequisites to reach long-term survival in solid tumors and hematologic malignancies, and this has also been proved in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients, particularly in the era of novel agents.1–3 Accordingly, both the Spanish and UK groups have shown the prognostic value and clinical relevance of minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) in both newly diagnosed transplant candidates and elderly MM patients treated with novel agents.4–6 However, the value of the depth of response in the relapse setting has been subject to far less investigation than in the up-front setting.7–11 In fact, there are few data exploring different outcomes between patients achieving very good partial response (VGPR) or complete response (CR) with salvage therapy,7–11 and there is no information regarding the prognostic value of achieving immunophenotypic or molecular responses at relapse. If MRD-negativity translated into superior outcomes, like those observed in newly diagnosed patients, then it could become a desirable end point for clinical trials exploring new drugs for relapse/refractory patients.In the present study, we focused on a total of 52 patients who after clinical relapse achieved CR with salvage therapy. Patients were divided into two categories: 21 rescued with novel agents followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT; n=21), and 31 patients rescued and achieving CR with novel agents (in all except 6) followed or not by autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) (11 and 14 cases, respectively).All samples were collected after informed patient consent according to the local ethical committees and the Declaration of Helsinki protocol. Median follow up was 2.7 years (32 months). MFC studies were performed on bone marrow (BM) samples using 4-color monoclonal antibody combinations (FITC/PE/PerCPCy5.5/APC), as described elsewhere.4,5,12 Plasma cells (PCs) were initially identified on the basis of strong CD38 expression and intermediate side scatter signals; discrimination between clonal and normal PCs was performed by the recognition of aberrant phenotypic expression profiles such as simultaneous downregulation of CD19 and CD45, with or without overexpression of CD56. For patients in whom CD45 or CD19 was positively expressed, lack of CD19 or CD45, respectively, dim CD38 intensity and/or bright CD56 staining (equal or higher than that of natural killer cells) allowed identification of clonal PCs in the vast majority of cases; in selected patients (n=7), CD56 was replaced by CD28, CD81 or CD117 since these markers were known to be more informative according to the base-line phenotypic evaluation. Data acquisition was performed in FACSCalibur and FACSCantoII flow cytometers (Becton Dickinson Biosciences, BDB, San Jose, CA, USA) using the FACSDiva 6.1 software (BDB), and a 2-step acquisition procedure allowing for a minimum of 2×105 leukocytes/tube to be selectively stored. Data analysis was performed using the Paint-a-Gate (BDB) and the Infinicyt software (Cytognos SL, Salamanca, Spain). Patients were defined as being MRD-negative when less than 20 clonal PCs were detectable by MFC, at a sensitivity level of 10?4. Time-to-progression (TTP) was measured from the moment of MRD assessment to the date of progression or last visit. Curves were plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log rank test was used to estimate the statistical significance of differences observed between curves. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI), as well as to perform a multivariate analysis including patients’ MRD status (dichotomized into negative/positive), type of treatment (dichotomized into yeso): autoSCT, novel agents; proteasome inhibition, immune modulators, as well as the event of extramedullary relapses (dichotomized into yeso). The X2 test was used to estim
机译:实现深层缓解是在实体瘤和血液系统恶性肿瘤中长期生存的先决条件之一,这在新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者中也已得到证实,特别是在新药时代。1-3因此,西班牙和英国的研究小组均显示了通过多参数流式细胞术(MFC)监测最小残留疾病(MRD)在新诊断的移植候选患者和使用新型药物治疗的老年MM患者中的预后价值和临床意义。4-6然而,与前期相比,在复发环境中缓解深度的价值受到的研究少得多。7-11实际上,很少有数据探讨实现良好部分缓解(VGPR)的患者之间的不同结局或使用挽救疗法的完全缓解(CR),[7-11]尚无有关在复发时实现免疫表型或分子应答的预后价值的信息。如果将MRD阴性转化为更好的结局,就像在新诊断的患者中观察到的那样,那么它可能成为探索针对复发/难治性患者的新药的临床试验的理想终点。在本研究中,我们集中于52名患者谁在临床复发后通过挽救疗法获得了CR。患者分为两类:21例用新药抢救,然后进行同种异体干细胞移植(alloSCT; n = 21); 31例患者用新药抢救并实现CR(除6例外),然后进行或不进行自体干细胞移植(autoSCT)(分别为11例和14例)。根据当地伦理委员会和《赫尔辛基宣言》的规定,在患者知情同意后收集所有样品。中位随访时间为2.7年(32个月)。如其他地方所述,使用4色单克隆抗体组合(FITC / PE / PerCPCy5.5 / APC)对骨髓(BM)样品进行MFC研究.4,5,12最初是在此基础上鉴定浆细胞(PC)强CD38表达和中间侧散射信号;通过识别异常的表型表达谱(例如同时下调CD19和CD45,有无CD56的表达)来区分克隆PC和正常PC。对于CD45或CD19阳性表达,缺少CD19或CD45的患者,CD38强度较弱和/或CD56染色较亮(等于或高于自然杀伤细胞)可在大多数情况下鉴定出克隆PC ;在选定的患者(n = 7)中,CD56被CD28,CD81或CD117取代,因为根据基线表型评估,这些标记物的信息量更大。使用FACSDiva 6.1软件(BDB)在FACSCalibur和FACSCantoII流式细胞仪(Becton Dickinson Biosciences,BDB,加利福尼亚州圣何塞,美国)中进行数据采集,并采用两步采集程序,最少需要2×105白细胞/管要有选择地存放。数据分析是使用Paint-a-Gate(BDB)和Infinicyt软件(Cytognos SL,西班牙萨拉曼卡)进行的。当通过MFC检测到少于20台克隆PC,敏感性水平为10?4时,患者被定义为MRD阴性。从MRD评估到进展或最后一次就诊之间的进展时间(TTP)进行了测量。通过Kaplan-Meier方法绘制曲线,并使用对数秩检验来估计曲线之间观察到的差异的统计显着性。使用Cox比例风险模型估算风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(95 %CI),并进行多变量分析,包括患者的MRD状况(分为阳性/阴性),治疗(分为“是/否”):autoSCT,新型药物;蛋白酶体抑制,免疫调节剂以及髓外复发事件(分为“是/否”)。 X2测试用于估计

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号