...
首页> 外文期刊>Hand >A Biomechanical Evaluation of a 2-Suture Anchor Repair Technique for Thumb Metacarpophalangeal Joint Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries
【24h】

A Biomechanical Evaluation of a 2-Suture Anchor Repair Technique for Thumb Metacarpophalangeal Joint Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries

机译:拇指掌指趾关节尺侧副韧带损伤的2线锚固修复技术的生物力学评估。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: A complete thumb ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) repaired with 1-suture anchor has been demonstrated to be significantly weaker compared with the intact UCL. The objective of this study is to test the biomechanical strength of a 2-anchor thumb UCL repair. Methods: Nine paired fresh-frozen hands were used for this biomechanical analysis. One thumb from each pair was randomized to the control group and one to the repair group. In the control group, the UCL was loaded to failure in tension. In the repair group, the UCL was dissected off of the proximal phalanx, subsequently repaired with a 2-anchor technique, and then tested to failure. Results: The mean yield load was 342 N (95% confidence interval [CI], 215-470 N) in the control group and 68 N (95% CI, 45-91 N) in the repair group. The mean maximum load at failure was 379 N (95% CI, 246-513 N) in the control group and 84 N (95% CI, 62-105 N) in the repair group. The mean stiffness was 72 N/m (95% CI, 48-96 N/m) in the control group and 17 N/m (95% CI, 13-21 N) in the repair group. The mean displacement at failure was 7.8 mm (95% CI, 7-9 mm) in the control group and 7.8 mm (95% CI, 7-9 mm) in the repair group. Conclusions: The 2-anchor repair technique we tested does not acutely reestablish the strength of the insertion of the native insertion of the UCL with this technique.
机译:背景:与完整的UCL相比,用1针锚固修复的完全拇指尺侧副韧带(UCL)明显弱于其。这项研究的目的是测试2锚拇指UCL修复的生物力学强度。方法:使用九只配对的新鲜冷冻手进行生物力学分析。每对中的一只拇指被随机分配到对照组,另一只被分配到修复组。在对照组中,UCL被加载至拉伸失败。在修复组中,将UCL从近端指骨上切开,随后用2锚技术修复,然后进行失败测试。结果:对照组的平均屈服负荷为342 N(95%置信区间[CI],215-470 N),修复组的平均屈服负荷为68 N(95%CI,45-91 N)。对照组平均故障最大负荷为379 N(95%CI,246-513 N),修复组平均为84 N(95%CI,62-105 N)。对照组的平均刚度为72 N / m(95%CI,48-96 N / m),修复组的平均刚度为17 N / m(95%CI,13-21 N)。对照组平均失败时位移为7.8 mm(95%CI,7-9 mm),而修复组则为7.8 mm(95%CI,7-9 mm)。结论:我们测试的2锚修复技术不能用这种技术来重新建立UCL天然插入的插入强度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号